Commentaries on the Surgery of the War in Portugal, Spain, France, and the Netherlands: from the battle of Roliça, in 1808, to that of Waterloo, in 1815; with additions relating to those in the Crimea in 1854-55, showing the improvements made during and since that period in the great art and science of surgery on all the subjects to which they relate.Guthrie, G. J. (George James)
History
Commentaries on the Surgery of the War in Portugal, Spain, France, and the Netherlands: from the battle of Roliça, in 1808, to that of Waterloo, in 1815; with additions relating to those in the Crimea in 1854-55, showing the improvements made during and since that period in the great art and science of surgery on all the subjects to which they relate.
Guthrie, G. J. (George James)
Crimean War, 1853-1856 -- Medical care; Napoleonic Wars, 1800-1815 -- Medical care; Surgery, Military -- Europe -- History; War wounds -- Europe -- History
1. That the artery is in general sound at the part in the front of
the thigh selected for operation, while it is usually unsound in the
popliteal space behind, or in the ham, where Desault operated, and
Anel recommended it to be done; that operation is now abandoned on the
continents of Europe and America, as well as in England.
2. That a ligature can readily be placed upon it at a distance from the
disease in the fore part of the thigh, and will usually be followed by
success as far as concerns the obliteration of the artery immediately
below the part on which it is applied.
3. That the artery being aneurismal, the collateral branches had begun
to enlarge, so as to be better able to carry on the circulation, after
the supply of blood to the lower part of the limb by the main trunk had
been cut off.
4. That no branches of importance are usually given off between the
ligature on the artery on the fore part of the thigh and the sac of the
aneurism in the ham.
5. That if such branches were ever given off, and brought the blood
from their collateral communications back into the main artery below
the ligature, and thence into the sac, so as to renew its pulsatory
movements, they would ultimately disappear, from the impelling force
not being sufficient to prevent a gradual coagulation taking place,
which would soon fill up the cavity of the sac, and thus prevent its
further enlargement; at which stationary point a process of removal
by absorption would begin and continue, until the diseased sac with
its contents had diminished, if not entirely disappeared, leaving only
a trace behind of its former existence, the process thus described
being frequently assisted by a commencing obliteration of the artery
immediately below the aneurism. The essential point in this theory,
which has immortalized the name of Hunter in surgery, depends on the
integrity of the aneurismal sac, which ultimately retains, as a general
rule, subject to rare exceptions, any blood which may be brought into
it, either by the collateral branches from above, or from below by what
may be called regurgitation, until it has become coagulated, when the
sac is so filled up that no more blood can pass into it to cause its
further distention, or any ulterior evil.
This theory of Mr. Hunter, then so new, so beautiful in itself, was
eagerly embraced by nearly all the civilized world; and surgeons
were not content with applying it to cases of diseased or aneurismal
arteries, to which it is especially applicable, but they extended it
indiscriminately to cases of wounded arteries, to which the practice of
the war in Spain proved it was inapplicable, and in which I have, since
1811, maintained it could only succeed as a matter of _accident_, not
of principle.
182. The essential features of the theory opposed to Mr. Hunter, with
respect to wounded arteries, and called mine, are:--
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account