The first two lines, forming together a single period of 182 days, refer to
a day III, as we see by the ending, and the last two to XIII, which
undoubtedly refers to the III Chicchan and XIII Akbal, the days so
significant in the preceding section. Hence an interval of 218 days (III
Chicchan to XIII Akbal) is to be assumed between the second and third
lines, with the addition of which interval each of the two periods extends
over 400 days.
The first and fourth series have the same difference; and the second and
third correspond with one another in this respect. In the first and fourth
the differences follow a rule, viz:--as if one were walking in a ring
having on its edge the numbers 1 to 13, and kept stepping backward four
numbers. The differences of the second and third series apparently do not
follow any rule. Hence I think that the fourth series follows the third by
mistake and ought rightfully to precede it. Only the fifth member in the
first and second series has the same day VIII and the day V in the third
and fourth series, otherwise the week-days of each series differ from those
of the others.
As I regard III Chicchan and XIII Akbal as unquestionably the
starting-points, I will here give a table of the days on which each of the
twenty-six members of each series must fall and at the same time I will
indicate for each day its number from the beginning of the series.
Accordingly the first 182 days present the following appearance:--
III 2.
1. 9. XII Ix
2. 14. IV Cauac
3. 15. V Ahau
4. 25. II Oc
5. 31. VIII Cib
6. 33. X Eznab
7. 44. VIII Muluc
8. 51. II Cib
9. 54. V Cauac
10. 66. IV Chuen
11. 74. XII Cauac
12. 78. III Akbal
13. 91. III Cib
14. 102. I Manik
15. 115. I Ahau
16. 126. XII Chuen
17. 127. XIII Eb.
18. 135. VIII Ahau
19. 141. I Cimi
20. 145. V Oc
21. 147. VII Eb
22. 160. VII Chicchan
23. 166. XIII Chuen
24. 172. V Caban
25. 180. I Chicchan
26. 182. III Manik
In the same way I will tabulate the second group of 182 days, but in this
case I shall place the fourth line before the third, which is probably
correct, and which shows for the first time parallelism of the two rows:--
XIII 20.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account