Common Cause: A Novel of the War in AmericaAdams, Samuel Hopkins
General
Common Cause: A Novel of the War in America
Adams, Samuel Hopkins
World War, 1914-1918 -- United States -- Fiction
“I don’t need it on those terms,” replied the owner of The Guardian.
“And you may tell Mr. Bausch from me that he lies.”
No other advertiser actually deserted the paper, though Verrall reported
much ill-feeling among the German mercantile element. The sturdy jeweler
alone was enough a man of principle to make his nationalism superior to
his business.
“Is it worth while?” was the argument posed by Embree, a fortnight
later when the bill, in re-amended form, was coming up again, and Jeremy
was whetting his pen for another tilt at it. “You’ve done the job. Can’t
you drop it now?”
“Have we done the job, though?”
“Surely. Look at the bill now. Practically everything you objected to is
out. I’ll guarantee it harmless, myself.”
What he said was in a sense true. Practically every point made in The
Guardian had been speciously met in the new draft of the bill. But, in
essence, it remained the same, an instrument of Deutschtum. Jeremy did
not look at the amended measure more than to give it a hasty glance. He
accepted it on the Honorable Martin Embree’s word; and as he did so he
was conscious deep within himself that he was dodging responsibility;
that he really did not want to know too much about the new form.
The Stockmuller incident had disturbed him, for he liked the little,
impetuous jeweler. Then, too, the accusation that he could endure with
the least equanimity was that of narrow-mindedness. Men whose sound
Americanism was as trustworthy as their technical judgment had endorsed
the measure. The Guardian went off guard. The bill became a law.
Unforeseen concomitants marked its political course. Embree, playing
expert politics, so arranged matters that Magnus Laurens was challenged
repeatedly on the “Corner School-House” issue. It did not lie within
Laurens’s vigorous and frank nature to refrain from declaring any
principle which he held. He replied in speeches which, slightly and
cleverly distorted by the trained German-language press, gave profound
and bitter offense to the German-Americans, even the best of them.
Taking up the controversy at the politically effective moment, Embree
pushed it, making the most of his adversary’s alleged prejudice and
narrowness, particularly in the foreign-born districts. Long before the
election it was evident that the school-house slogan alone would beat
Laurens. He was heavily defeated. That morning’s golf with Jeremy did
it.
In honor, The Guardian had refrained from making use of the “Corner
School-House” issue against Laurens. Jeremy at least would not play the
turncoat. He persuaded himself that, in resisting Embree’s arguments for
a strategic change of base, he was doing all that could be required
of him. Nevertheless, it was with an inner qualm that he met Magnus
Laurens, a week after the election, their first interview since the
golf-game.
“Well, Mr. Laurens,” he said, “you made a good fight. We can’t all win.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account