This moral nature, which we are thus led to ascribe to our Creator, includes, in the first place, the existence of a feeling that whatever lessens or destroys happiness is unfitted to the system of the universe, and that _voluntary sacrifice and suffering to purchase the highest possible happiness is fitted to or in accordance with the eternal nature of things_. Next, we are thus taught that in the Eternal Mind is existing that _sense of justice_ which involves the desire of good to the author of good, and of evil to the author of evil, which requires that such retributions be _proportioned_ to the good and evil done, and to the _voluntary_ power of the agent. Lastly, we are thus instructed that the Author of all created things possesses that susceptibility called _conscience_, which includes, in the very constitution of mind itself, retributions for right and wrong actions. But while we thus assume that the mind of the Creator is, so far as we can conceive, precisely like our own in constitutional organization, we are as necessarily led to perceive that the _extent_ of these powers is far beyond our own. A mind with the power, wisdom, and goodness exhibited in the very small portion of his works submitted to our inspection, who has inhabited eternity, and developed and matured through everlasting ages--our minds are lost in attempting any conception of the extent of such infinite faculties! But we have another intuitive truth to aid in our deductions. It is that by which we infer the continuance of a _uniformity in our experience_; that is, we necessarily believe that "things will continue as they are and have been, unless there is evidence to the contrary." Now all past experience as to the nature of mind has been uniform. Every mind known to us is endowed with intellect, susceptibility, and will, like our own. So much is this the case, that when any of these are wanting in a human being, we say he has "lost his mind." Again: all our experience of mind involves the idea of the _mutual relation of minds_. We perceive that minds are made to match to other minds, so that there can be no complete action of mind, according to its manifest design, except in relation to other beings. A mind can not love till there is another mind to call forth such emotion. A mind can not bring a tithe of its power into appropriate action except in a community of minds. The conception of a solitary being, with all the social powers and sympathies of the human mind infinitely enlarged, and yet without any sympathizing mind to match and meet them, involves the highest idea of unfitness and imperfection conceivable.