In Africa, where there is perfect uniformity in nature, there is
uniformity in man; and the negro stock, though prolific, gives no race
of high development to the world. Both extremes are equally unfavorable
to the advance of man; he must have, in order to expand and take the
place to which his possibilities lead him, a sphere of mutual conditions,
to which a compact continent like Africa and Central Asia can lay no
claim, and at the same time be free from that extreme individualization
characteristic of the islands of Polynesia.
Europe lies between these extremes. Limited in area, diversified in
surface, and deeply indented in its coast-line, it has experienced all
the advantages which a continent needs for its development, and for that
historical greatness which Europe has won for itself. Less striking in
natural scenery and comparatively poor in resources, its contrasts in
respect mainly to the action of its inland seas and rivers over the main
land have conduced to the happiest results. It has become the school for
the Old and the New World, taking the vitality and the crude gifts of
Asia and turning them into channels where they could issue in new forms
for the advancement and the humanizing of the race.
The Results of the above Considerations briefly stated.
It will be seen, from what has now been said, that, with an area three
times less than that of Africa, Europe (including its adjacent islands)
has a coast-line twice as extended. Without the islands, it is 25,380
miles in length, or the circumference of the earth. The coast-line of
Africa extends 17,860 miles; that of Asia 32,900.
The exceedingly varying areas of the continents may now be passed in very
speedy review. Europe is but a fifth as large as Asia. It is somewhat
more than a quarter as large as Africa; it is almost of the same size
with Australia. In relation to America, it stands between Asia and
Africa; it makes about ¹⁄₁₅ of all the continents, and about ¹⁄₂₀ of all
the land surface of the globe; but it is not absolute size, but relative,
which determines the importance of a continent; and this twentieth part
of all the land on the globe has had paramount influence over all the
rest within the past few centuries. The ethnographical character of
its population has had great weight in securing this result, and other
reasons will doubtless be more apparent in the future.
One of the most important features in the study of the relative
importance of the continents is the comparative relation of the main
trunk, articulation, and island system to each other. The following table
presents this relation as it exists in the Old World:—
Africa: trunk 1, extremities 0, islands ¹⁄₅₀
Asia: ” 4, ” 1, ” ⅛
Europe: ” 2, ” 1, ” ¹⁄₂₀
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account