Didactic fiction; Political fiction; Social problems -- Fiction
"And there's one other point: Until we learn these lessons, we've got to
see our strong men and women cut down by tuberculosis, we've got to
stand by and watch a slaughter of innocent babies that makes Herod's
little massacre look like a schoolboy's naughtiness. The socialists
don't like the word 'violence.' The reality is in the air we breathe.
The landlord wracks rent out of the poor by violence--no amount of legal
drivel can hide the fact that every injustice of our present society is
put through by the aid--on the treat--of police. The whole force of the
state is back of the grafters. It's violence that drives people into the
sweat-shops, that drives the boys to crime and the girls to
prostitution. And all this deadly injustice will go on until we've
learned the lessons of justice and liberty. Let us learn them as
peacefully and legally as possible, but we must learn them. Blood isn't
a nice thing to look at, but it isn't as unspeakably horrible as the
sputum of tuberculosis."
"What you are saying is rank anarchy," Braun protested.
"I've told you a hundred times you can't scare me by calling names.
'Anarchy' is just as much a word of progress as 'Socialism.' I think
you've got the best of it when it comes to a description and analysis of
society and industrial development. But the Anarchists have got you
backed off the map in the understanding of human motives and social
impulses.
"I'm an optimist, Yetta, about this social conflict. I don't think it
matters much what form people give to their activity. The important
thing is not to be neutral. The thing that is needed is a passion for
righteousness. Once a person sees--really sees--the conflict between
greed and justice, and enlists in the revolution, it doesn't matter much
whether he goes into the infantry or cavalry or artillery. I see in
society a ruling class growing fat off injustice, a great, lethargic
mass, indifferent through ignorance, and a constantly growing army of
revolt. Anybody who doubts the outcome is a fool. History does not
record a single year which did not bring some victory for Justice. But a
person's equally a fool--I mean you, Isadore--who tries to prophesy just
how the war will be conducted. There isn't any omniscient general back
of us, directing the campaign. The progress towards victory is the
result of myriad efforts, uncoordinated, often conflicting. It is
entirely irrational--just like evolution. The anthropoidal ape, sitting
under a prehistoric palm tree and picking fleas off his better half, did
not know how--through the ages--his offspring were going to become men.
Even with our superior intellects, our ability to study the records of
the past and guess into the future, we cannot presage the steps of the
progress. The directing force is the instinctive common sense of life.
It's a more mysterious force than any theological God. It's always on
the job, always pushing life through new experiments, through
'variations' to the better form.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account