Didactic fiction; Political fiction; Social problems -- Fiction
"That!" Isadore said, jumping at a point of attack, "is, I guess, the
fundamental difference between us. You're a sort of mediævalist, living
in a realm of romance and fairy stories--ruled over by your instinctive
sense of life. You forget that we live in the age of reason. You said
liberty consisted in abilities. Well, I believe that abilities bring
obligations. Instead of jeering at reason and dialectics, I think it's
our preëminent ability. We, reasoning animals, have a duty to use and
perfect--and trust--our intellects. And the Socialist theory is the
biggest triumph of the human mind. The theory of evolution is the only
thing to compare with it. But Darwin had only to fight a superstition.
It wasn't much of a feat to convince thinking people that it took more
than one hundred and forty-four hours to create the world--then his
case was practically won. Marx had to fight not only such theological
nonsense, but the entire opposition of the ruling class. Socialism had
always been proscribed. A college professor who taught it frankly would
lose his job. But it has never had a set-back. It has gathered about it
as brilliant a group of intellects as has Darwinism. It's growing
steadily.
"Having no trust in reason, you are driven back to violence. But I do
believe in intelligence. I don't want to hang my hope of the future on
such illogical things as dynamite and flying bullets.
"If you don't respect intellect and logic, of course you don't
sympathize with Socialism. But you can't ask me to give up the results
of my own reasoning, backed as they are by the best brains of our times,
to accept your imaginings."
"I don't ask you to give up Socialism," Walter laughed. "On the
contrary, as long as it seems truth to you, give up all the rest. Your
ability seems to find its right setting in the party--just as Mabel's
does in the trade-unions--just as I'd be ill at ease and useless in
either.
"The point I want to insist on is my faith that, back of your reasoning
and activity and back of my speculations and laziness, this instinctive
sense of life is working out its own purpose. Only future generations
will be able to know which--if either of us--is right."
This argument thrilled and fascinated Yetta. In the years that were to
follow she was to hear such debates repeated endlessly. The new circle
of friends she was to make were as passionately interested in such
questions of social philosophy and ethics as are the art students of
Paris in the relative value of line and color or the concept of pure
beauty. In time talking would lose its charm; she was to realize
that--as Walter had said--it often leads to brain-fag. But this, her
first experience, was an immense event.
The two men leaned back in their chairs, their faces relaxed. They
seemed to have talked themselves out. Yetta turned to Mabel, who sat
beside her on the window-seat.
"You're not a Socialist?" she asked.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account