Conference of Officers in Charge of Government Hospitals Serving Veterans of the World War
History
Conference of Officers in Charge of Government Hospitals Serving Veterans of the World War
Medicine, Military; Military hospitals; World War, 1914-1918 -- Veterans -- Medical care -- United States
Another thing he took up was the situation in Arizona. Attempts have
recently been made to get the Bureau to put hospitals in two towns,
Phoenix and Tucson, both of which he stated were so hot that everybody
would have to get out in the summer. There are 431 vacant beds at
Prescott, within 400 miles, and in a few months 422 more will be
available. Transportation has been offered these men to these hospitals
but many have refused to go. He believed that the Veterans’ Bureau could
do more than this, but wanted an expression of opinion on the subject.
MR. BURKE: asked for further discussions on the questions raised by Colonel
Patterson.
DR. KLAUTZ: stated that he would like to ask Col. Patterson whether the
question of furloughs has been taken up in connection with disciplinary
regulations.
COLONEL PATTERSON: informed him that length or frequency of furloughs had
not been determined, but permission to be absent will be obtained from
District Managers under policies issued by the Central Office from time
to time. He asked for an expression of opinion on this subject.
DR. KLAUTZ: stated in regard to the situation in Arizona that probably all
the hospitals available there were situated in an altitude of 5000 ft.
COL. PATTERSON: informed him that Camp Kearny is lower than this. He stated
that the policy of the Veterans’ Bureau in regard to tuberculosis has
the backing of the National Tuberculosis Association, and that the men
asking for hospitalization had been offered transportation to Kearny or
Prescott.
DR. KLAUTZ: offered the suggestion that somewhere in the mountains North of
Tucson there might be places which were not too high and would be good
all the year round.
COL. PATTERSON: reported that there are already at Prescott 131 vacant beds
and within four months will be 432 additional. Why should we go to
additional expense when we have these other hospitals?
DR. LONG: took up the subject of the speeding up of patients in hospitals,
which is necessary for two reasons—first, in the interest of the man
himself, and, second, in the interest of economy. The average man was
about 25 years of age when he entered the service, and it should be
taken into consideration that his character had not been formed, and
that keeping him in a hospital tends to destroy still further his
initiative, so the sooner a man gets out of the hospital the better it
will be for him. As for economy, it costs about $240 a month to keep a
man in a hospital. He stated that dispensaries are now being established
in the district and sub-offices, where treatment can be obtained, thus a
man should be discharged as soon as he has reached the maximum
improvement. He cited the case of Palo Alto, where arrangements had been
made with Dr. Wheate that when a man had reached the maximum hospital
improvement such further treatment as was needed should be obtained in
the out-patient office. In about six weeks the total number of patients
was reduced from 540 to 417.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account