It goes without saying that any definite order or instruction which effects the policies and functions of the U. S. Veterans’ Bureau and which may be issued to the field is sure of a series of return re-actions from various parts of the country, both as to the manner in which such an order is applied and as to the consequences of its application. These reactions are naturally good, bad, and indifferent; exact and truthful statements or colored as to the manner in which they affect the various individuals in its application, but coming from all parts of the United States they afford many valuable and effective criticisms of the order in question and are illuminating as to the original intent of the order and the amount of deviation or variation from its original purpose brought about by the manner in which it is put into effect. The criticisms of General Order No. 26 had to do very largely with the “Four Days’ Notice” clause, and because of the fact that large numbers of beneficiaries in hospitals were being discharged without provisions having been made for out-patient care, dental care, physiotherapy, or other treatment where such was indicated and necessary; that patients were being discharged without having proper arrangements made for vocational training where the patient in question was feasible for some kind of training and was anxious to get it; that many such patients had to leave a hospital when they were receiving no compensation or where adjustments or readjustments of matters related to compensation needed to be carried out here. These were the dominant and outstanding criticisms which followed the issuance of General Order No. 26, and as a result of these criticisms, it was considered advisable to issue a supplemental order correcting the defects complained of. Accordingly General Order No. 26–A came out under date of November 17, 1921. The re-actions to General Order No. 26 were as I have just stated and came largely from the Bureau beneficiaries, from friends, relatives, and allied agencies working in the field. The criticisms of General Order No. 26–A, however, came largely from the hospitals and the District offices, the hospitals particularly. There was an apparent contradiction between the two orders. No. 26–A seemed to largely or entirely contradict the provisions of the original Order No. 26. General Order No. 26 stated that patients not requiring further hospital treatment should be given four days to complete personal arrangements and then be discharged.