Many features of our work are, I recognize, trying and a thousand and one annoyances are a part of each day’s work. Keeping before us at all times the meaning of the work involved is a great aid to the elimination of misunderstanding, and personal conferences serve to smooth out and adjust overlapping of authority. One ex-service man maimed or injured, replaced into his particular niche of our social fabric should make us feel appreciative of what our work means, and the knowledge that we are rebuilding men who have suffered in the service of our country, should fortify us very strongly against the annoyances and trials which must sink into insignificance when compared with the work done. I know that you all realize this and that your every effort and energy is bent to the accomplishment of the purpose for which we are all working together; that we are making headway in the proper direction is beyond question; that we are helping to rebuild the disabled is becoming more apparent as our work goes along, and we all, I know, are not only proud that we are having a part in this work, but feel privileged that our services are helping to bring about these ends.” Upon the conclusion of Dr. Guthrie’s paper, the subject-matter of the several papers read during the morning session was thrown open to discussion, the presiding officer remarking in this connection that full opportunity would be given to all to freely express themselves. With reference to the matter of the issuance of so-called conflicting orders, which had been referred to, he stated that the administration of the Veterans’ Bureau is regulated by certain laws upon which these orders were based, and that when such laws are changed, it of course becomes necessary to revoke certain orders in force at the time. He added that the matter of hospitalization, thrown suddenly upon the Public Health Service and the U. S. Veterans’ Bureau is a tremendous undertaking and that those who carry on this work are entitled to the sympathy of all good people. COL. BRATTON: wished to place himself on record as saying that there is nobody who is in greater sympathy with the wounded soldier, whom he would like to see receive all that a grateful Government can give, but that due to the very liberality of the Sweet Bill, cases have crept in whereby compensation is being received for disabilities in no way connected with the service. He stated that the Sweet Bill does not clearly define what the line of duty shall be and that he is amazed at the number of cases that are being carried along and hospitalized; that he is of the opinion that the gentlemen in Congress do not realize how liberal this act is and that men would receive compensation for diseases which existed prior to their coming into service. He offered the following motion amending section 300 of the Sweet Bill, to be incorporated in a resolution to Congress as coming from this body, which resolution was adopted: