A man was being examined whose salary and commission had for over
twenty years been more than £1200 a year. His debts were over £5000,
contracted in all sorts of extravagant ways, and his creditors were
very angry indeed. Now his assets were nil--I heard nothing about the
selling up of his home or of his being turned out of the house for
which he was supposed to pay £100 a year rent. In reply to questions he
pleaded that he had a large family, but it turned out that the eldest
was twenty-five and the youngest fourteen. Asked what reason he could
assign for being in this position, he could or would give none but
living beyond his means. Then came the very pertinent question, what
did he propose to do?
Well, in the first place, said his eminent solicitor, his employers
were willing to retain him in their service providing that he obtained
his discharge, but not otherwise. Supposing that to be the case, his
earnings would be much reduced, say to £800 a year. Now the proposition
made was that whatever he earned over £600 a year should be set aside
to be distributed _pro rata_ among his creditors until they had
received a dividend of five shillings in the pound on their claims.
All this on condition only that he received his discharge then and
there. There was some little talk, purely I judged for the sake of
appearances, and then he was discharged to begin again. Now I do not
say that this was injustice, but if it was just, what was I to call the
treatment I subsequently received?
I was presently subjected to a searching examination by a very clever
gentleman, who dilated upon my iniquity in continuing to trade after I
knew that I was unable to fulfil my obligations. All the questions put
were from the notes of my preliminary examination, and I felt very
grateful for my excellent memory.
No creditor appeared to say a word in my disfavour, and the examination
was concluded, nothing apparently having been done for or against me. I
was puzzled, and as soon as I got outside the Court I eagerly enquired
of my faithful Mr Hardhat, who was waiting for me, what I ought to do
now. "Apply for your discharge at once," said he, "for if you delay it,
the period you will be suspended for (and it's sure to be two years),
will only date from the time of application, however long hence that
may be." Of course I was eager to apply at once, but when I learned
that there would be more fees to pay amounting to several pounds, none
of which money would benefit my creditors at all, I indignantly refused
to do anything of the sort, and said that I didn't care if I was never
discharged, I would pay no more fees if I had thousands. And I rejoice
to say that I never did.
CHAPTER XVII
THE DAY DAWNS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account