Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
It is manifest, however, from what took place at a synod of bishops held
in Cirta in 305 that many of the natural leaders of the African Church
had quailed before the persecution of Diocletian. They had assembled,
under the presidency of Secundus, Bishop of Tigisis and Primate of
Numidia, in order to fill the vacant see of Cirta. Secundus opened the
proceedings by inviting all present to clear themselves of the charge of
having surrendered their Holy Books, and began to put the question
directly to each in turn. Donatus of Mascula returned an evasive answer,
and said that he was responsible only to God. Many pleaded that they had
substituted other books for the Scriptures; Victor of Russicas alone
confessed that he had handed over the Four Gospels. “Valentinianus, the
Curator, himself compelled me to send them,” he said; “pardon me this
fault, even as God pardons me.” Then came the turn of Purpurius, Bishop
of Limata. Secundus accused him not of being a _traditor_, but of the
murder of two of his nephews. Purpurius stormed with rage. He vowed that
he would not be browbeaten, and declared that Secundus was no better
than his fellows and had purchased his own immunity, like the rest of
them, by surrendering the Scriptures. As for murdering his nephews, the
charge was true. “I did kill them,” he said, “and I kill all who stand
in my way.” This candid avowal seems to have occasioned no surprise
among the members of this extraordinary synod; they were all too
indignant with Secundus for raising inconvenient questions and
pretending to a sanctity beyond his colleagues. Eventually, another
nephew of Secundus threatened that they would all withdraw from his
communion and make a schism (_recedere et schisma facere_), unless he
let the matter drop. “What business is it of yours what each has done?”
asked the outspoken nephew. “It is to God that each must tender his
account.” The president thereupon drew in his horns, pronounced the
acquittal of the accused, and with a general murmur of “_Deo gratias_,”
they proceeded to the election of a bishop. Their choice fell upon
Sylvanus, himself a _traditor_, much, it is said, to the indignation of
the people of Cirta, who raised cries of, “He is a _traditor_: let
another be elected. We want our bishop to be pure and upright.” Sylvanus
had surrendered, without even a show of compulsion, one of the sacred
silver lamps from the altar of his church. It is more than possible that
the report of the proceedings at this synod, which is found only in
works written specifically—but by episcopal hands—against the Donatists,
is highly exaggerated. Among the bishops present at Cirta were those
who, a few years later, were the principal leaders of the Donatist
schism. But, even when all allowances are made for party colouring, the
picture it gives of the Numidian Church is far from flattering.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account