Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
Under his leadership the Donatists rapidly increased in numbers. They
were schismatics rather than heretics. They had no great distinctive
tenet; what they seem to have insisted upon chiefly was absolute purity
within the Church and freedom from worldly taint. That was their ideal,
as it has been the ideal of many other wild sectaries since their day.
They claimed special revelations of the Divine Will; they insisted upon
rebaptising their converts, compelling even holy virgins to take fresh
vows on joining their communion, which they boasted was that of the one
true Church. Such a sect naturally attracted to itself all the fanatical
extremists of Africa and all those who had any grievance against the
Catholic authorities. It became the refuge of the revolutionary, the
bankrupt, and the criminal, and thus, inside the Donatist movement
proper, there grew up a kind of anarchist movement against property,
which had little or no connection with religious principles.
Constantine, during the remainder of his reign, practically ignored the
African Church. He had done what he could and he wiped his hands of it.
There soon arose an extravagant sect which took the name of
Circumcelliones, from their practice of begging food from cell to cell,
or cottage to cottage. They renounced the ordinary routine of daily
life. Forming themselves into bands, and styling themselves the
Champions of the Lord (ἀγωνιστικόι), they roamed through the
countryside, which they kept in a state of abject terror. St. Augustine,
in a well-known passage, declares that when their shout of “Praise be to
God!” was heard, it was more dreaded than the roar of a lion. They were
armed with wooden clubs, which they named “Israels,” and these they did
not scruple to use upon the Catholics, whose churches they entered and
plundered, committing the most violent excesses, though they were
pledged to celibacy. Gibbon justly compares them to the Camisards of
Languedoc at the commencement of the 18th century, and others have
likened them to the Syrian Assassins at the time of the Crusades and the
Jewish Sicarii of Palestine during the first century of the Christian
era. They formed, it seems, a sort of Christian Jacquerie, possessed in
their wilder moments with a frantic passion for martyrdom and imploring
those whom they met to kill them. The best of them were fit only for a
madhouse; the worst were fit only for a gaol. Probably they had little
connection with the respectable Donatists in the cities, whose
organisation was precisely the same as that of the Catholics, and their
operations were mainly restricted to the thinly populated districts on
the borders of the desert.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account