Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
“Arianism would appeal to not a few minds by adopting a position
virtually rationalistic, and by promising to secure a Christianity
which should stand clear of philosophical objections, and Catholics
would answer by insisting that the truths pertaining to the Divine
Nature must be pre-eminently matter of adoring faith, that it was rash
to speculate beyond the limit of revelation, and that the Arian
position was itself open to criticism from reason’s own point of view.
Arians would call on Catholics to ‘be logical’; to admit the prior
existence of the Father as involved in the very primary notion of
fatherhood; to halt no more between a premiss and a conclusion, to
exchange their sentimental pietism for convictions sustainable by
argument. And Catholics would bid them in turn remember the inevitably
limited scope of human logic in regard to things divine and would
point out the sublime uniqueness of the divine relation called
Fatherhood.”
-----
Footnote 89:
_The Age of the Fathers_, chap. vi.
-----
If we consider the subsequent history of the Arian doctrine, its
continual rebirth, the permanent appeal which, in at least some of its
phases, it makes to certain types of intellect including some of the
loftiest and shrewdest, there can be no reason for surprise that Arius
met with so much recognition and sympathy, even among those who refused
him their active and definite support. Alexander was both troubled and
annoyed to find that so many of the Eastern bishops took Arius’s part,
and he sent round a circular letter of remonstrance which had the effect
of arousing some of these kindly ecclesiastics to a sense of the danger
which lurked in the Arian doctrine. But Arius was soon to find his
ablest and most influential champion in the person of another Eusebius,
Bishop of Nicomedia in Bithynia. This Eusebius had been Bishop of
Berytus (Beyrout), and it has been thought that he owed his translation
from that see to the more important one of Nicomedia to the influence of
Constantia, sister of Constantine and wife of Licinius. He had, at any
rate, been sufficiently astute to obtain the good-will of Constantine on
the fall of his old patron and he stood well with the court circle.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account