Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
(“Who will care to seek the golden age of Saturn? Ours is the age of
jewels, but jewels of Nero’s setting.”) If Constantine, like Saturn, had
devoured his children and had lapsed for the moment into a savage tyrant
of Nero’s pattern, it was not for Eusebius to judge him. He was writing
for edification. Constantine had averred his willingness to cast his
cloak over a sinning bishop lest scandal should arise; ought not an
ecclesiastical historian to cast the cloak of charitable silence over
the crimes of a most Christian Emperor? When, therefore, Eusebius
describes[111] how, after the death of Licinius, men cast aside all
their former fears, and dared to raise their long-downcast eyes and look
up with a smile on their faces and brightness in their glance; how they
honoured the Emperor in all the beauty of victory and “his most orderly
sons and Heaven-beloved Cæsars”; and how they straightway forgot their
old troubles and all unrighteousness, and gave themselves up to an
enjoyment of their present good things and their hope of others to come;
it is a healthy corrective to recall the murderous outbreak of
ungovernable wrath which made Rome shudder as it listened to the
whispered tale of what was taking place in the recesses of the Palatine.
The entire subject is one on which it is as fascinating as it is easy to
speculate. On the whole, it seems most likely that Constantine’s fears
had been worked upon to such an extent that he believed himself
surrounded by traitors in his own family, that the Empress Fausta had
been the leading spirit in the plot to ruin Crispus, and that when the
Emperor discovered his mistake he turned in fury upon his wife. It may
be, as Eutropius suggests, that his mental balance had been upset by his
extraordinary success, that his prosperity and the adulation of the
world had been too much for him.[112] That is a charitable theory which,
in default of a better, we, too, may as well adopt.
-----
Footnote 110:
ii., c. 4.
Footnote 111:
_De Vita Const._, ii., p. 19.
Footnote 112:
_Verum insolentia rerum secundarum aliquantum Constantinus ex illa
favorabili animi docilitate mutavit_ (x., p. 6).
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account