Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
Such a deity may have satisfied the philosophers, but it certainly was
not the deity whom Constantine worshipped throughout his reign. Had he
been indifferent to religion, or indifferent to Christianity, had he
even been anxious only to hold the balance between the rival creeds, he
would never have surrounded himself by episcopal advisers; never have
set his hand to such edicts as those we have quoted; never have
abolished the use of the cross for the execution of criminals or have
forbidden Jews to own Christian slaves; never have called the whole
world time and again to witness his zeal for Christ; never have lavished
the resources of the Empire upon the building of sumptuous churches;
never have listened with such extraordinary forbearance to the
wranglings of the Donatists and the subtleties of Arians and
Athanasians; never have summoned or presided at the Council of Nicæa;
and certainly never have made the welfare of non-Roman Christians the
subject of entreaty with the King of Persia. Constantine was prone to
superstition. He was grossly material in his religious views, and his
own worldly success remained still in his eyes the crowning proof of the
Christian verities. But the sincerity of his convictions is none the
less apparent, and even the atrocious crimes with which he sullied his
fair fame cannot rob him of the name of Christian. It was a name, says
St. Augustine,[145] in which he manifestly delighted to boast, mindful
of the hope which he reposed in Christ (_Plane Christiano nomine
gloriosus, memor spei quam gerebat in Christo_).
-----
Footnote 145:
_Contra Lit. Petil._, ii., 205.
-----
[Illustration]
CHAPTER XVI
THE EMPIRE AND CHRISTIANITY
The reorganisation of the Empire, begun by Diocletian, had been
continued along the same lines by Constantine the Great. There were
still further developments under their successors, but these two were
the real founders of the Imperial system which was to subsist in the
eastern half of the Empire for more than eleven hundred years. In other
words, Diocletian and Constantine gave the Empire, if not a new lease of
life, at least a new impetus and a new start, and we may here present a
brief sketch of the reforms which they introduced into practically every
sphere of governmental activity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account