Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
If Maxentius had been accused of all the vices only on the authority of
the Christian authors and the official panegyrists of Constantine, their
statements might have been received with some suspicion—for a fallen
Roman Emperor had no friends. Zosimus, however, is almost as severe upon
him as Lactantius, and Julian, in the _Banquet of the Cæsars_, excludes
him from the feast as one utterly unworthy of a place in honourable
society. According to Aurelius Victor, he was the first to start the
practice of exacting from the senators large sums of money in the guise
of free gifts (_munerum specie_) on the flimsiest pretexts of public
necessity, or as payment for the bestowal of office or civil
distinction. Moreover, knowing that, sooner or later, he would find
himself at war with one or other of his brother Augusti, Maxentius
amassed great stores of corn and wealth and took no heed of a morrow
which he knew that he might not live to witness. He despoiled the
temples,—says the author of the Ninth Panegyric,—butchered the Senate,
and starved the people of Rome. The Praetorians—who had placed and kept
him on the throne—ruled the city. Zosimus tells the curious story of
how, in the course of a great fire in Rome, the Temple of Fortune was
burned down and one of the soldiers looking on spoke blasphemous and
disrespectful words of the goddess. Immediately the mob attacked him.
His comrades went to his assistance and a serious riot ensued, during
which the Prætorians would have massacred the citizens had they not been
with difficulty restrained. All the authorities, indeed, agree that a
perfect reign of terror prevailed at Rome after Maxentius’s victory over
Alexander in Africa, while Maxentius himself is depicted as a second
Commodus or Nero.
One of the most vivid pictures of the tyrant is given in the Panegyric
already quoted. The orator speaks of Maxentius as a “stupid and
worthless wild-beast” (_stultumet nequam animal_) skulking for ever
within the walls of the palace and not daring to leave the precincts.
Fancy, he exclaims, an indoor Emperor, who considers that he has made a
journey and achieved an expedition if he has so much as visited the
Gardens of Sallust! Whenever he addressed his soldiers, he would boast
that, though he had colleagues in the Empire, he alone was the real
Emperor; for he ruled while they kept the frontiers safe and did his
fighting for him. And then he would dismiss them with the three words:
“_Fruimini! Dissipate! Prodigite!_” Such an invitation to drunkenness,
riot, and debauch would not be unwelcome to the swaggering Prætorians
and to the numerous bands of mercenaries which Maxentius had collected
from all parts of the world.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account