Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
At the same time, the two Emperors agreed to elevate their sons to the
rank of Cæsar. Constantine bestowed the dignity upon Crispus, the son of
his first marriage with Minervina. Crispus was now in the promise of
early manhood, and had proved his valour, and won his spurs in the
recent campaign. Licinius gave the title to his son Licinianus, an
infant no more than twenty months old. These appointments are important,
for they shew how completely the system of Diocletian had broken down.
The Emperors appointed Cæsars out of deference to the letter of that
constitution, but they outrageously violated its spirit by appointing
their own sons, and when the choice fell on an infant, insult was added
to injury. It was plain warning to all the world that Constantine and
Licinius meant to keep power in their own hands. When, a few years
later, three sons were born to Constantine and Fausta in quick
succession, the eldest, who was given the name of his father, was
created Cæsar shortly after his birth. No doubt the Empress—herself an
Emperor’s daughter—demanded that her son should enjoy equal rank with
the son of the low-born Minervina, and the probabilities are that
Constantine already looked forward to providing the young Princes with
patrimonies carved out of the territory of Licinius. However, there was
no actual rupture between the two Emperors until 323, though relations
had long been strained.
We know comparatively little of what took place in the intervening
years. They were not, however, years of unbroken peace. There was
fighting both on the Danube and the Rhine. The Goths and the Sarmatæ,
who had been taught such a severe lesson by Claudius and Aurelian that
they had left the Danubian frontier undisturbed for half a century,
again surged forward and swept over Moesia and Pannonia. We hear of
several hard-fought battles along the course of the river, and then,
when Constantine, at the head of his legions, had driven out the
invader, he himself crossed the Danube and compelled the barbarians to
assent to a peace whereby they pledged themselves to supply the Roman
armies, when required, with forty thousand auxiliaries. The details of
this campaign are exceedingly obscure and untrustworthy. The Panegyrists
of the Emperor claimed that he had repeated the triumphs of Trajan.
Constantine himself is represented by the mocking Julian as boasting
that he was a greater general than Trajan, because it is a finer thing
to win back what you have lost than to conquer something which was not
yours before. The probabilities are that there took place one of those
alarming barbarian movements from which the Roman Empire was never long
secure, that Constantine beat it back successfully, and gained victories
which were decisive enough at the moment, but in which there was no real
finality, because no finality was possible. Probably it was the
seriousness of these Gothic and Sarmatian campaigns which was chiefly
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account