Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
Zosimus attributes the war to the ambition of Constantine; Eutropius
roundly accuses[61] him of having set his heart upon acquiring the
sovereignty of the whole world. On the other hand, Eusebius[62] depicts
Constantine as a magnanimous monarch, the very pattern of humanity, long
suffering of injury, and forgiving to the point of seventy times seven
the ungrateful intrigues of the black-hearted Licinius. According to the
Bishop of Cæsarea, Constantine had been the benefactor of Licinius, who,
conscious of his inferiority, plotted in secret until he was driven into
open enmity. But it is very evident that the reason of Eusebius’s enmity
to Licinius was the anti-Christian policy into which the Emperor had
drifted, as soon as he became estranged from Constantine. A more
detailed description of Licinius’s religious policy and of the new
persecution which broke out in his provinces will be found in another
chapter; here we need only point out Eusebius’s anxiety to represent the
cause of the quarrel between the Emperors as being in the main a
religious one. He tells us[63] that Licinius regarded as traitors to
himself those who were friendly to his rival, and savagely attacked the
bishops, who, as he judged, were his most bitter opponents. The phrase,
not without reason, has given rise to the suspicion that the Christian
bishops of the East were regarded as head centres of political
disaffection, and Licinius evidently suspected them of preaching treason
and acting as the agents of Constantine. We have not sufficient data to
enable us to draw any sure inference, but the bishops could not help
contrasting the liberality of Constantine to the Church, of which he was
the open champion, with the reactionary policy of Licinius, which had at
length culminated in active persecution.
-----
Footnote 61:
Eutropius, x., 5: _Principatum totius orbis adfectans._
Footnote 62:
Euseb., _De Vita Const._, i., 50.
Footnote 63:
_Ibid._, i., 56.
-----
[Illustration:
THE WESTERN SIDE OF A PEDESTAL, SHOWING THE HOMAGE OF THE VANQUISHED
GOTHS.
FROM GROSVENOR’S “CONSTANTINOPLE.”
]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account