Noun-dom (in its largest extension, including Nouns Substantive and Nouns Adjective, together with their Words of Relation, Prepositions and Conjunctions) constitutes, therefore, the STATISMUS (or Domain of the Principle of Rest) within the RELATIONISMUS (or Domain of Parts and their Construction, or _Syntaxis_ into a whole) of the larger Domain of Language, which might then be properly denominated the Linguismus of the Universe. (Every new Science has to have its new nomenclature. Let the reader not be repelled, therefore, by these innovations upon the speech usages of our Language; their great convenience, and their actual necessity even for the right discussion of the subject, furnishing their sufficient apology.) To determine what the limits of the corresponding Domain are in the Universe at large, and its proper technical designation, it is only necessary to go back upon the analogues already indicated. We have, then, the Statismus of the Relationismus of the Universe; which is the Structural Universe, viewed in respect to the relationship between the parts and the whole, and as if arrested in Space, or, what is the same thing, abstracted from Movement in Time. In going over to the new Domain in Language,--the Grammar of the Verb and Participle,--we pass then, technically speaking, to the MOTISMUS of the RELATIONISMUS of Language; and in going over to the corresponding Domain of the Universe at large, we pass to the MOTISMUS of the RELATIONISMUS of the _Universe_, in which action and the relations between actions are concerned. Since Motion and Action involve the idea of Force or Power, for which the Greek word is _dynamis_, furnishing the English words _Dynamic_ and _Dynamics_, our Philosophers have chosen the distinction _Static_ and _Dynamic_, instead of _Static_ and _Motic_, the true distinction, and have in that way obscured and disguised from themselves even the fundamental and all-important relationship of these two great Aspects of Being, with the two great negative Grounds or Containers of all Being; _namely, with_ SPACE _and with_ TIME _respectively_. It is here, in the Domain of Movement and Time, the Motismus of Language, and especially of Grammar,--the Relationismus of Language,--that the Grand Lingual Illustration or Type of the Second Subdivision of Kant's Group of Relation occurs;--the subdivision which he _should_ have denominated _Tempic_, as distinguished from the former Subdivision (of Substance and Inherence), which _should_ then have been called _Spacic_. This Tempic Sub-Group of Relation again subdivides, as already stated, into 1. CAUSE, and 2. DEPENDENCE.