PUT IN THE MORTAR PEPPER, LOVAGE AND ORIGANY, MOISTEN WITH BROTH AND
RUB; ADD COOKED BRAINS AND MIX DILIGENTLY SO THAT THERE BE NO LUMPS.
INCORPORATE FIVE EGGS AND CONTINUE MIXING WELL TO HAVE A GOOD
FORCEMEAT WHICH YOU MAY THIN WITH BROTH. SPREAD THIS OUT IN A METAL
PAN, COOK, AND WHEN COOKED [cold] UNMOULD IT ONTO A CLEAN TABLE. CUT
INTO HANDY SIZE. [Now prepare a sauce] PUT IN THE MORTAR PEPPER,
LOVAGE AND ORIGANY, CRUSH, MIX WITH BROTH PUT INTO A SAUCE PAN, BOIL,
THICKEN AND STRAIN. HEAT THE PIECES OF BRAIN PUDDING IN THIS SAUCE
THOROUGHLY, DISH THEM UP, SPRINKLED WITH PEPPER, IN A MUSHROOM DISH
[2].
[1] The Original has no title for this dish.
[2] List. and G.-V. here start the next formula, but
Tor. continues without interruption. Cf. Note 2 to No.
46.
[46] A DISH OF SCALLOPS
_ISICIA EX SPONDYLIS_ [1]
[Lightly] COOK SCALLOPS [or the firm part of oysters] REMOVE THE HARD
AND OBJECTIONABLE PARTS, MINCE THE MEAT VERY FINE, MIX THIS WITH
COOKED SPELT AND EGGS, SEASON WITH PEPPER, [shape into croquettes and
wrap] IN CAUL, FRY, UNDERLAY A RICH FISH SAUCE AND SERVE AS A
DELICIOUS ENTRÉE [2].
[1] Sch. _sfondilis_; G.-V. _sphondylis_; List.
_spongiolis_. According to Lister, this is a dish of
mushrooms, but he is wrong. He directs to remove sinews
when mushrooms haven't any, but shellfish have. Torinus
is correct. Gollmer makes the same mistake, believing
_spondyli_ to be identical with _spongioli_. He and
Danneil take _elixata_ for "choice" when this plainly
means "cooked." If one were not sure of either word, the
nature of the subject would leave no room for any doubt.
Cf. note 1 to Nos. 115-121.
[2] We may find a reason for the combination of these
last three distinctly different formulæ into one article
in the following explanation. It is possible that these
dishes were served together as one course, even on one
platter, thus constituting a single dish, as it were.
Such a dish would strongly resemble platters of
"_fritures_" and "_fritto misto_" (mixed fried foods)
esteemed in France and Italy. We, too, have "Shore
Dinners" and other "Combination Platters" with lobster,
crabs, scallops, shrimps, mushrooms, tomatoes--each
article prepared separately, but when served together
will form an integral part of ONE dish.
The above formulæ, though somewhat incomplete, are good
and gastronomically correct. A combination of these
_isicia_ such as we here suggest would be entirely
feasible and would in fact make a dish of great
refinement, taxing the magiric artist's skill to the
utmost. We would class them among the _entremets chauds_
which are often used on a buffet table or as hot _hors
d'œuvres_.
[47] ANOTHER KIND OF KROMESKIS [1]
_ALITER ISICIA OMENTATA_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account