Cooley's Cyclopædia of Practical Receipts and Collateral Information in the Arts, Manufactures, Professions, and Trades..., Sixth Edition, Volume ICooley, Arnold James
Science
Cooley's Cyclopædia of Practical Receipts and Collateral Information in the Arts, Manufactures, Professions, and Trades..., Sixth Edition, Volume I
Cooley, Arnold James
Formulas, recipes, etc.; Industrial arts -- Dictionaries; Technology -- Dictionaries
Several other methods of alcoholometry, besides those already noticed,
have been adopted at various times, but the majority of them possess so
little accuracy as to be quite inapplicable to the purposes of trade, and
of the laboratory. Thus, the strength was at one time estimated by what
was called the ‘proof.’ A little of the spirit was poured upon a small
quantity of gunpowder, contained in a spoon or saucer, so as just to
moisten it, and was then inflamed. If at the end of the combustion the
gunpowder took fire, the spirit was held to be ‘above proof,’ if it only
languidly fizzed away, or slowly burnt, the spirit was said to be ‘proof,’
but if the gunpowder failed to ignite, the spirit was esteemed ‘below
proof.’ Hence arose the terms ‘proof’ and ‘proof spirit,’ which have since
been adopted by Act of Parliament. Another method was that of dropping oil
into the spirit; if the oil floated, the spirit was considered to be
‘under proof,’ if it sunk, it was rated as ‘proof’ or ‘over-proof.’ The
‘gunpowder test’ is quite fallacious; for, if a certain quantity of a
spirit is capable of firing the gunpowder, a little excess of a spirit 20%
or 25% stronger will often fail to do so, so much water being formed as to
prevent the ignition. The ‘PREUVE D’HOLLAND’ test, of the French, or the
‘BEAD,’ is still frequently employed by persons unacquainted with the use
of the hydrometer. It consists in shaking the spirit in a phial, and
observing the size, number, and duration of the bubbles or beads, as they
are called. The larger and more numerous these are, and the more rapidly
they break and disappear, the stronger the spirit is presumed to be. This
method is unreliable, as the presence of sugar or acid, even in minute
quantities, will sometimes give to a weak sample the appearance of one
many degrees stronger. LOVI’S BEADS are also often employed to ascertain
approximately the strength of spirit, when a hydrometer is not at hand.
The insufficiency of most of the methods of alcoholometry here referred
to, throws us back on the Revenue System (Sykes’ hydrometer), or on the
specific gravity for unsweetened spirits. For sweetened spirits, as
cordials, wines, beers, &c., there are none of the tests which give such
accurate results as the distillation test, previously described as the
Revenue Method.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account