Beagle Expedition (1831-1836); Coral reefs and islands; Geology -- South America; Islands; Volcanoes
Ellis (“Nat. Hist. of Coralline,” page 96) states that Ombellularia was
procured in latitude 79° N. _sticking_ to a _line_ from the depth of
236 fathoms; hence this coral either must have been floating loose, or
was entangled in stray line at the bottom. Off Keeling atoll a compound
Ascidia (Sigillina) was brought up from 39 fathoms, and a piece of
sponge, apparently living, from 70, and a fragment of Nullipora also
apparently living from 92 fathoms. At a greater depth than 90 fathoms
off this coral island, the bottom was thickly strewed with joints of
Halimeda and small fragments of other Nulliporæ, but all dead. Captain
B. Allen, R.N., informs me that in the survey of the West Indies it was
noticed that between the depth of 10 and 200 fathoms, the sounding lead
very generally came up coated with the dead joints of a Halimeda, of
which he showed me specimens. Off Pernambuco, in Brazil, in about
twelve fathoms, the bottom was covered with fragments dead and alive of
a dull red Nullipora, and I infer from Roussin’s chart, that a bottom
of this kind extends over a wide area. On the beach, within the
coral-reefs of Mauritius, vast quantities of fragments of Nulliporæ
were piled up. From these facts it appears, that these simply organized
bodies are amongst the most abundant productions of the sea.)
Although the limit of depth, at which each particular kind of coral
ceases to exist, is far from being accurately known; yet when we bear
in mind the manner in which the clumps of coral gradually became
infrequent at about the same depth, and wholly disappeared at a greater
depth than twenty fathoms, on the slope round Keeling atoll, on the
leeward side of the Mauritius, and at rather less depth, both without
and within the atolls of the Maldiva and Chagos Archipelagoes; and when
we know that the reefs round these islands do not differ from other
coral formations in their form and structure, we may, I think, conclude
that in ordinary cases, reef-building polypifers do not flourish at
greater depths than between twenty and thirty fathoms.
It has been argued[36] that reefs may possibly rise from very great
depths through the means of small corals, first making a platform for
the growth of the stronger kinds. This, however, is an arbitrary
supposition: it is not always remembered, that in such cases there is
an antagonist power in action, namely, the decay of organic bodies,
when not protected by a covering of sediment, or by their own rapid
growth. We have, moreover, no right to calculate on unlimited time for
the accumulation of small organic bodies into great masses. Every fact
in geology proclaims that neither the land, nor the bed of the sea
retain for indefinite periods the same level. As well might it be
imagined that the British Seas would in time become choked up with beds
of oysters, or that the numerous small corallines off the inhospitable
shores of Tierra del Fuego would in time form a solid and extensive
coral-reef.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account