Your Majesty having been pleased to refer to your privy council the
Queen's memorial, claiming as of right to celebrate the ceremony of
her coronation on the 19th day of July, being the day appointed for
the celebration of your Majesty's royal coronation; and Lord
Viscount Sidmouth, one of your Majesty's principal secretaries of
state, having communicated to the Queen the judgment pronounced
against her Majesty's claim; in order to preserve her just rights,
and those of her successors, and to prevent the said minute being in
after-times referred to as deriving validity from her Majesty's
supposed acquiescence in the determination therein expressed, the
Queen feels it to be her bounden duty to enter her most deliberate
and solemn protest against the said determination; and to affirm and
maintain, that by the laws, usages, and customs of this realm, from
time immemorial, the queen-consort ought of right to be crowned at
the same time with the king's majesty.
In support of this claim of right, her Majesty's law officers have
proved before the said council, from the most ancient and authentic
records, that queens-consort of this realm have, from time
immemorial, participated in the ceremony of the coronation with
their royal husbands. The few exceptions that occur demonstrate,
from the peculiar circumstances in which they originated, that the
right itself was never questioned, though the exercise of it was
from necessity suspended, or from motives of policy declined.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account