In that alliance her Majesty believed that she exchanged the
protection of her family for that of a royal husband, and that of a
free and noble-minded nation. From your Majesty, the Queen has
experienced only the bitter disappointment of every hope she had
indulged. In the attachment of the people she has found that
powerful and decided protection which has ever been her steady
support and her unfailing consolation. Submission, from a subject,
to injuries of a private nature, may be matter of expedience--from a
wife it may be matter of necessity--but it never can be the duty of
a queen to acquiesce in the infringement of those rights which
belong to her constitutional character.
The Queen does therefore repeat her must solemn and deliberate
protest against the decision of the said council, considering it
only as the sequel of that course of persecution under which her
Majesty has so long and so severely suffered; and which decision, if
it is to furnish a precedent for future times, can have no other
effect than to fortify oppression with the forms of law, and to give
to injustice the sanction of authority. The protection of the
subject from the highest to the lowest, is not only the true but
the only legitimate object of all power; and no act of power can be
legitimate which is not founded on those principles of eternal
justice, without which law is but the mask of tyranny, and power the
instrument of despotism.
_Queen's House, July 17._
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account