Corruption in American politics and lifeBrooks, Robert C. (Robert Clarkson)
History
Corruption in American politics and life
Brooks, Robert C. (Robert Clarkson)
Political corruption -- United States; United States -- Social conditions -- 1865-1918
As between countries which muzzle the press and those which allow
liberty it is inevitable, then, that the governments of the latter
will be charged far more openly and frequently with corruption.
Citizens who are shocked by the accusations thus trumpeted forth may be
pardoned some apprehensions for the continued stability and success of
their institutions. The sentiment does them more credit than callous
disregard or brazen Chauvinism, and is altogether more likely to be
productive of good works in the future. But it may easily be carried
to an extreme. National shamefacedness is not a virtue. In forming a
judgment of the extent of contemporary corruption the garrulity of
politicians, the sensationalism of the press, the popular demand for
highly spiced accounts of official sinning should all be taken into
account. A cynical representative of yellow journalism, replying to
the criticism that his paper indulged too much in lengthy and lurid
accounts of crime and immorality, remarked rather sententiously that
“sin is news.” The statement is only partially true. Most sins are too
common and too petty to have any news value. Only those offences that
to current estimation seem large and dangerous are given prominence
and headlines. If Turkey and China enjoyed the blessings of a free
press it is hardly probable that the papers of those countries would
give much space to what, according to Western standards, would be
frankly considered corrupt and extortionate practices on the part of
their pashas and mandarins. Such practices would be so common, so
universally known, and so little in conflict with contemporary Turkish
and Chinese political morals that they would excite little interest
and comment. If then, as in our own papers, accounts of atrocious
crimes and accusations of corrupt practices are given the same large
measure of prominence it means simply that both kinds of offences are
considered to possess a high degree of news value. Puritans may deplore
the popular taste which finds interest in such reports, but we cannot
deny the existence of that interest. Primarily it exists not because
sin as such is news but because offences which are considered large and
dangerous appeal powerfully to the popular mind.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account