Cotton is king, and pro-slavery arguments : $b comprising the writings of Hammond, Harper, Christy, Stringfellow, Hodge, Bledsoe, and Cartwright, on this important subject
History
Cotton is king, and pro-slavery arguments : $b comprising the writings of Hammond, Harper, Christy, Stringfellow, Hodge, Bledsoe, and Cartwright, on this important subject
Scott, Dred, 1809-1858; Slavery -- Justification; Slavery -- United States; United States -- Fugitive slave law (1850)
Failure of free colored people in attaining an
equality with the whites--Their failure also in
checking Slavery--Have they not aided in its
extension? Yes--Facts in proof of this
view--Abolitionists bad Philosophers--Colored
men's influence destructive of their
hopes--Summary manner in which England acts in
their removal--Lord Mansfield's
decision--Granville Sharp's labors and their
results--Colored immigration into
Canada--Information supplied by Major
Lachlan--Demoralized condition of the blacks as
indicated by the crimes they committed--Elgin
Association--Public meeting protesting against its
organization--Negro meeting at Toronto--Memorial
of municipal council--Negro riot at St.
Catherines--Col. Prince and the Negroes--Later
cases of presentation by Grand Jury--Opinion of
the Judge--Darkening prospects of the colored
race--Views of Rev. Henry Ward Beecher--Their
accuracy--The lesson they teach.
BUT little progress, it will be seen, has been made, by the free colored
people, toward an approximation of equality with the whites. Have they
succeeded better in aiding in the abolition of slavery? They have not,
as is abundantly demonstrated by the triumph of the institution. This is
an important point for consideration, as the principal object
influencing them to remain in the country, was, that they might assist
in the liberation of their brethren from bondage. But their agency in
the attempts made to abolish the institution having failed, a more
important question arises, as to whether the free colored people, by
refusing to emigrate, may not have contributed to the advancement of
slavery? An affirmative answer must be given to this inquiry. Nor is a
protracted discussion necessary to prove the assertion.
One of the objections urged with the greatest force against
colonization, is, its tendency, as is alleged, to increase the value of
slaves by diminishing their numbers. "Jay's Inquiry," 1835, presents
this objection at length; and the Report of the "Anti-Slavery Society of
Canada," 1853, sums it up in a single proposition thus:
"The first effect of beginning to reduce the number of slaves, by
colonization, would be to increase the market value of those left
behind, and thereby increase the difficulty of setting them free."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account