Cotton is king, and pro-slavery arguments : $b comprising the writings of Hammond, Harper, Christy, Stringfellow, Hodge, Bledsoe, and Cartwright, on this important subject
History
Cotton is king, and pro-slavery arguments : $b comprising the writings of Hammond, Harper, Christy, Stringfellow, Hodge, Bledsoe, and Cartwright, on this important subject
Scott, Dred, 1809-1858; Slavery -- Justification; Slavery -- United States; United States -- Fugitive slave law (1850)
=======================================================================
Coffee, Imported, | Value, $15,525,954 | lbs. 199,049,823
" Re-Exported, | 1,163,875 | " 13,349,319
" Slave-Labor | |
production, | 12,059,476 | " 156,108,569
| |
Sugar, Imported, | $15,093,003 | " 464,427,281
" Re-Exported, | 819,439 | " 18,981,601
" Slave-Labor | |
production, | 14,810,091 | " 459,743,322
| |
Molasses, Imported, | $3,684,888 | gals. 31,886,100
" Re-Exported, | 97,880 | " 488,666
" Slave-Labor | |
production, | 3,607,160 | " 31,325,735
| |
Tobacco, etc., Imported, | $4,175,238 |
" Re-Exported, | 312,733 |
" Slave-Labor | |
production, | 3,674,402 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE.--A part of the modifications necessary in this table to adopt it
to 1859, can be inferred from some of the tables which follow.
TABLE IV.
FREE COLORED AND SLAVE POPULATION, OF THE STATES
NAMED, IN THE PERIODS OF TEN YEARS, FROM 1790 TO
1850, WITH THE RATIO OF INCREASE OR DECREASE PER
CENT. PER ANNUM, OF THE FORMER.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account