Cotton is king, and pro-slavery arguments : $b comprising the writings of Hammond, Harper, Christy, Stringfellow, Hodge, Bledsoe, and Cartwright, on this important subject
History
Cotton is king, and pro-slavery arguments : $b comprising the writings of Hammond, Harper, Christy, Stringfellow, Hodge, Bledsoe, and Cartwright, on this important subject
Scott, Dred, 1809-1858; Slavery -- Justification; Slavery -- United States; United States -- Fugitive slave law (1850)
Consideration of foreign cultivation of Cotton
further considered--Facts and opinions slated by
the London Economist--Consumption of Cotton
tending to exceed the production--India affords
the only field of competition with the United
States--Its vast inferiority--Imports from India
dependent upon price--Free Labor and Slave Labor
cannot be united on the same field--Supply of the
United States therefore limited by natural
increase of slaves--Limited supply of labor tends
to renewal of slave trade--Cotton production in
India the only obstacle which Great Britain can
interpose against American Planters--Africa, too,
to be made subservient to this
object--Parliamentary proceedings on this
subject--Successful Cotton culture in
Africa--Slavery to be permanently established by
this policy--Opinions of the _American
Missionary_--Remarks showing the position of the
Cotton question in its relations to slavery--Great
Britain building up slavery in Africa to break it
down in America.
THE remark which closes the preceding chapter was made in 1856. An
opportunity is now offered for recording the results of the movements of
Great Britain to promote cotton culture in her own possessions between
that and 1859. The results will be startling. Few anti-slavery men in
the United States expected that Great Britain would so soon be engaged
zealously in establishing slave labor in Africa, or that Lord Palmerston
should publicly commend the measure. The question is one of so much
importance as to demand a full examination. The extracts are taken,
mainly, from the _London Economist_, a periodical having the highest
reputation for candor and fair dealing. On Feb. 12, 1859, the
_Economist_ said:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account