Crania Ægyptiaca: Or, Observations on Egyptian Ethnography Derived from Anatomy, History and the MonumentsMorton, Samuel George
History
Crania Ægyptiaca: Or, Observations on Egyptian Ethnography Derived from Anatomy, History and the Monuments
Morton, Samuel George
Craniology -- Egypt; Ethnology -- Egypt
A similar physiognomy preponderates among the royal Egyptian
personages of every epoch, as will be manifest to any one who will
turn over the pages of Champollion and Rosellini. The head of Horus
(Plate XIV., Fig. 2,) is an admirable illustration, while in the
portraits of Rameses IV., and Rameses IX., (Plate XIV., Fig. 6 and 7,)
the same lines are apparent, though much less strongly marked. How
admirably also are they seen in the subjoined juvenile head, (Fig. 1,)
which is that of a royal prince, copied from the very ancient
paintings in the tomb of Pehrai, at Eletheias.[28] So also in the face
of Rameses VII., (Fig. 2,) who lived perhaps one thousand years later
in time.
[Illustration:
Fig. 1. Fig. 2.
]
I observe that the priests almost invariably present this physiognomy,
and in accordance with the usage of their caste, have the head closely
shaven. When coloured they are red, like the other Egyptians. The
subjoined drawing, (No. 1,) which is somewhat harsh in outline, is
from the portico of one of the pyramids of Meroë,[29] and is probably
one of the oldest human effigies in Nubia. They abound in all the
temples of that country, and especially at Semneh, Dakkeh, Soleb,
Gebel-Berkel, and Messoura.[30]
From the numberless examples of similar conformation, I select another
of a priest from the bas-relief at Thebes, which is remarkable for
delicacy of outline and pleasing serenity of expression.[31] (No. 2.)
So invariably are these characters allotted to the sacerdotal caste,
that we readily detect them in the two priests who, by some
unexplained contingency, become kings in the twentieth dynasty. Their
names read Amensi-Hrai-Pehor and Phisham on the monuments; and the
accompanying outline is a fac-simile of Rosellini’s portrait of the
latter personage, who lived about eleven hundred years before the
Christian era.[32] In this head the Egyptian and Pelasgic characters
appear to be blended, but the former preponderate. (No. 3.)
The last outline, (No. 4,) represents a modification of the same type,
that of the _Harper_ in Bruce’s tomb at Thebes. The beautiful form of
the head and the intellectual character of the face, may be compared
with similar efforts of Grecian art. It dates with Rameses the IV.[33]
[Illustration:
1. 2.
3. 4.
]
As I believe this to be a most important ethnographic indication, and
one which points to the vast body of the Egyptian people, I subjoin
four additional heads of priests from a tomb at Thebes, of the
eighteenth dynasty. We are forcibly impressed with the delicate
features and oblique eye of the left hand personage, and with the
ruder but characteristic outline of the other figures, in which the
prominent face, though strongly drawn, is essentially Egyptian.[34]
[Illustration]
[Illustration]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account