Creation or Evolution? A Philosophical InquiryCurtis, George Ticknor
Religion
Creation or Evolution? A Philosophical Inquiry
Curtis, George Ticknor
Creation; Evolution
[58] "Biology," i, p. 336.
[59] "Biology," i, pp. 336, 337.
[60] Webster's "Dictionary of the English Language."
[61] Let it be remembered that the sense which is here considered
comprehends not only material objects, but also ideas, images, and
in short whatever, in its kind, had no previous existence. This is
just as true of an original poem, or picture, or statue, or musical
composition, as it is of a machine that is both original and new as a
piece of mechanism.
[62] Perhaps I owe an apology to a large class of readers for having
bestowed so much attention upon the logical formula with which Mr.
Spencer aims to dispose of the idea of creation. But I have observed,
especially among young persons and others whose habits of thinking
are unformed or not corrected by sound and comprehensive reasoning, a
popular reception of this particular dogma, which makes it necessary
to subject it to some careful analysis. In fact, one of my chief
objects in writing this book has been to contribute what I might
to the formation of habits of testing philosophical and scientific
theories by something better than specious assumptions which can be
thrown into the plausible form of logical propositions. There is
nothing more valuable than logic, when its forms represent a true and
correct ratiocination; and, when they do not, there is nothing that is
more delusive. It needs some discipline of mind to enable people to
see when logic is valuable and when it is not.
[63] "Biology," i, p. 340 _et seq._
[64] This is given almost _verbatim_ from Mr. Spencer's "Biology," i,
p. 340 _et seq._
[65] In treating of the existence of physical and moral evil, I do
not mean to include sin in the discussion. I mean now by moral evil
that loss or diminution of happiness, for the individual or a race,
which results from physical evil produced by causes for which the
sufferer is not responsible. The sin that is in the world is a matter
that is to be considered entirely with reference to the accountability
of man as a moral being; and the reasons which may be assigned for
its permission may be quite distinct from those which relate to the
existence of physical suffering for which man is not responsible upon
any rational theory of moral accountability.
[66] "Biology," i, p. 354.
[67] "Biology," i, p. 339.
[68] "Biology," i, pp. 344, 355.
CHAPTER V.
The doctrine of evolution according to Herbert Spencer further
considered.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account