Creation or Evolution? A Philosophical InquiryCurtis, George Ticknor
Religion
Creation or Evolution? A Philosophical Inquiry
Curtis, George Ticknor
Creation; Evolution
SOPHEREUS. Let me state for myself just what my conclusions
are in regard to the solar system. You will then know what the
convictions are with which I shall come to the study of other
departments. I have arrived at the conception of an Infinite Being
having the power to create anything that seems to him good; and I
have experienced no difficulty in conceiving what an act of creation
is. I have also reached the conviction that there is one great object
in Nature, the existence of which I can not account for without the
hypothesis of some special act of creation. Whether I shall find this
to be the case in regard to every other object in Nature, I can not
now tell. Perhaps, as many of these objects are nearer to us, and more
within our powers of investigation, the result may be different. I
shall endeavor to keep my mind open to the necessary discriminations
which facts may disclose. Possibly I may find reason to reverse the
conclusions at which I have arrived in regard to the solar system, if
I find that the hypothesis of evolution is fairly sustained by other
phenomena.
NOTE.--Newton, whose reasoning powers have certainly not
been surpassed by those of any other philosopher, ancient or modern,
not only deduced the existence of a personal God from the phenomena
of Nature, but he felt no difficulty in ascribing to the Deity those
personal attributes which the phenomena of Nature show that he must
possess, because without them "all that diversity of natural things
which we find suited to different times and places" could not have
been produced. They could, he reasons, "arise from nothing but the
ideas and will of a Being necessarily existing." Newton does indeed
say that all our notions of God are taken from the ways of mankind;
but this is by way of allegory and similitude. There is a likeness,
but not a perfect likeness. There is therefore no necessity for
ascribing to God anthropomorphic attributes, because the enlargement
of the faculties and powers to superhuman and boundless attributes
takes them out of the category of anthropomorphic qualities and
capacities. In his "Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy,"
Newton had occasion to treat of the theory of vortices, as a
hypothesis by which the formation of the solar system is to be
explained. The "General Scholium," by which he concludes the third
book of his "Principia," lays down the masterly reasoning by which he
maintains that the bodies of the solar system, while they persevere
in their orbits by the mere laws of gravity, could by no means have
at first derived the regular position of the orbits themselves from
those laws. I had written the whole of the preceding chapter on the
origin of the solar system just as I have printed it, before I looked
into the "Principia" to see what confirmation might be derived from
Newton's speculations. I found that while I had not included the
comets in my examination of the solar system, but had confined myself
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account