Creation or Evolution? A Philosophical InquiryCurtis, George Ticknor
Religion
Creation or Evolution? A Philosophical Inquiry
Curtis, George Ticknor
Creation; Evolution
NOTE.--It will readily occur to the reader that Sophereus
might most pertinently have asked: Whence did the primal cell
originate? It is conceived of as the ultimate unit of organizable
matter; invisible to the naked eye, perhaps incapable of being
reached by the microscope, but consisting of an infinitesimally small
portion of matter, more or less organized in itself, and possessing a
capacity to unite with itself other minute particles of matter, and
so to form larger aggregates of molecules. The hypothesis is, that
this single cell has given origin to all animated organisms, and,
through an indefinite series of such organisms, to the human race.
The single cell, then, having this capacity and this extraordinary
destiny, was either the first and only one of its kind, or it was one
of many of the same kind. If we select any supposed point of time
in the far antecedent history of matter, the question may be asked
whether there existed at first but one such cell, or many. If there
were many of such cells, how came they to exist? If one only was
selected out of many, for this extraordinary destiny of giving origin
to all the animated organisms, who or what made the selection for
this transcendent office of the one cell? If there never was but one
such cell, how did it come to exist? As these questions are clearly
pertinent, the effort to answer them inevitably conducts us to the
idea of creation, or else to the conclusion that the numerous cells
and the selected one had no origin; that the selection was not made,
but was accidental; or that the one cell, if there never was but one,
was not a created thing. Human reason can not accept this conclusion.
FOOTNOTES:
[106] "Biology," i, p. 482.
[107] "Biology," i, Appendix, pp. 483, 484.
[108] "Biology," i, p. 408.
[109] "Biology," i, pp. 409, 410.
[110] "Biology," i, p. 482.
[111] Now contained in "Biology," i, Appendix.
[112] Quoted by M. Guizot in his "History of France," vol. vi, p.
328. Guizot observes that Buffon was "absolutely unshackled by any
religious prejudice," and that he "involuntarily recurred to the
account given in Genesis."
CHAPTER X.
"Species," "races," and "varieties"--Sexual division--Causation.
The two friendly disputants have again met. Sophereus begins their
further colloquy, in an effort to reach a common understanding of
certain terms, so that they may not be speaking of different things.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account