Critical and Historical Essays — Volume 2Macaulay, Thomas Babington Macaulay, Baron
History
Critical and Historical Essays — Volume 2
Macaulay, Thomas Babington Macaulay, Baron
English literature -- History and criticism; Great Britain -- History
This could not last. A circumstance which, when the mutual regard of
the friends was in its first glow, would merely have been matter for
laughter, produced a violent explosion. Maupertuis enjoyed as much
of Frederic’s goodwill as any man of letters. He was President of the
Academy of Berlin; and he stood second to Voltaire, though at an immense
distance, in the literary society which had been assembled at the
Prussian Court. Frederic had, by playing for his own amusement on the
feelings of the two jealous and vainglorious Frenchmen, succeeded in
producing a bitter enmity between them. Voltaire resolved to set his
mark, a mark never to be effaced, on the forehead of Maupertuis, and
wrote the exquisitely ludicrous Diatribe of Doctor Akakia. He showed
this little piece to Frederic, who had too much taste and too much
malice not to relish such delicious pleasantry. In truth, even at this
time of day, it is not easy for any person who has the least perception
of the ridiculous to read the jokes on the Latin city, the Patagonians,
and the hole to the centre of the earth, without laughing till he cries.
But though Frederic was diverted by this charming pasquinade, he was
unwilling that it should get abroad. His self-love was interested. He
had selected Maupertuis to fill the chair of his Academy. If all Europe
were taught to laugh at Maupertuis, would not the reputation of the
Academy, would not even the dignity of its royal patron, be in some
degree compromised? The King, therefore, begged Voltaire to suppress
this performance. Voltaire promised to do so, and broke his word.
The Diatribe was published, and received with shouts of merriment and
applause by all who could read the French language. The King stormed.
Voltaire, with his usual disregard of truth, asserted his innocence, and
made up some lie about a printer or an amanuensis. The King was not to
be so imposed upon. He ordered the pamphlet to be burned by the common
hangman, and insisted upon having an apology from Voltaire, couched in
the most abject terms. Voltaire sent back to the King his cross, his
key, and the patent of his pension. After this burst of rage, the
strange pair began to be ashamed of their violence, and went through the
forms of reconciliation. But the breach was irreparable; and Voltaire
took his leave of Frederic for ever. They parted with cold civility;
but their hearts were big with resentment. Voltaire had in his keeping
a volume of the King’s poetry, and forgot to return it. This was, we
believe, merely one of the oversights which men setting out upon a
journey often commit. That Voltaire could have meditated plagiarism
is quite incredible. He would not, we are confident, for the half of
Frederic’s kingdom, have consented to father Frederic’s verses. The
King, however, who rated his own writings much above their value, and
who was inclined to see all Voltaire’s actions in the worst light, was
enraged to think that his favourite compositions were in the hands of an
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account