Critical and Historical Essays — Volume 2Macaulay, Thomas Babington Macaulay, Baron
History
Critical and Historical Essays — Volume 2
Macaulay, Thomas Babington Macaulay, Baron
English literature -- History and criticism; Great Britain -- History
Arbuthnot, some years later, ridiculed the Partition Treaty with
exquisite humour and ingenuity. Everybody must remember his description
of the paroxysm of rage into which poor old Lord Strutt fell, on hearing
that his runaway servant Nick Frog, his clothier John Bull, and his old
enemy Lewis Baboon, had come with quadrants, poles, and inkhorns, to
survey his estate, and to draw his will for him. Lord Mahon speaks of
the arrangement with grave severity. He calls it “an iniquitous compact,
concluded without the slightest reference to the welfare of the states
so readily parcelled and allotted; insulting to the pride of Spain,
and tending to strip that country of its hard-won conquests.” The most
serious part of this charge would apply to half the treaties which have
been concluded in Europe quite as strongly as to the Partition Treaty.
What regard was shown in the Treaty of the Pyrenees to the welfare of
the people of Dunkirk and Roussillon, in the Treaty of Nimeguen to the
welfare of the people of Franche Comte, in the Treaty of Utrecht to the
welfare of the people of Flanders, in the treaty of 1735 to the welfare
of the people of Tuscany? All Europe remembers, and our latest posterity
will, we fear, have reason to remember how coolly, at the last great
pacification of Christendom, the people of Poland, of Norway, of
Belgium, and of Lombardy, were allotted to masters whom they abhorred.
The statesmen who negotiated the Partition Treaty were not so far beyond
their age and ours in wisdom and virtue as to trouble themselves much
about the happiness of the people whom they were apportioning among
foreign rulers. But it will be difficult to prove that the stipulations
which Lord Mahon condemns were in any respect unfavourable to the
happiness of those who were to be transferred to new sovereigns. The
Neapolitans would certainly have lost nothing by being given to the
Dauphin, or to the Great Turk. Addison, who visited Naples about the
time at which the Partition Treaty was signed, has left us a frightful
description of the misgovernment under which that part of the Spanish
Empire groaned. As to the people of Lorraine, an union with France would
have been the happiest event which could have befallen them. Lewis was
already their sovereign for all purposes of cruelty and exaction. He had
kept their country during many years in his own hands. At the peace
of Ryswick, indeed, their Duke had been allowed to return. But the
conditions which had been imposed on him made him a mere vassal of
France.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account