Crying for the Light; Or, Fifty Years Ago. Vol. 2 [of 3]Ritchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
General
Crying for the Light; Or, Fifty Years Ago. Vol. 2 [of 3]
Ritchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
England -- Social conditions -- 19th century -- Fiction
In the meanwhile the Baronet continued his canvass, and his carriage with
the family arms, and the servants in the family liveries, were
incessantly to be seen. He appealed to the Churchmen as one of
themselves, to the Dissenters as their friend and ally in the cause of
religious freedom. As a landowner he reminded the farmers that they were
all in the same boat, and that legislation that was beneficial to the
landlord was equally to the advantage of the tenant and the farm-labourer
as well. No one was such an ardent admirer of the manufacturing system
which had made us a nation of shopkeepers, and he won the hearts of the
manufacturers as he told them that to him they seemed as the very pillars
of the State. Somehow or other he seemed in a fair way of success, and
when he got into a mess his agent was there to pull him out. Thus, one
day he happened to call on a humble shopkeeper, who regarded him with
natural distrust.
‘Oh, Sir Watkin,’ said he, ‘I am sure I respect you and your family very
much; but before I promise you my vote I’d like to hear what are your
principles.’
Sir Watkin was about to give the usual and evasive reply, when his agent
pulled him back and opened a broadside:
‘His _principles_. You ask a gentleman like Sir Watkin his principles;
go along with you! Things have come to a pretty pass when a gentleman
like Sir Watkin must stop in the road to tell you his principles. Come
along, Sir Watkin, don’t be losing precious time here.’ And the small
shopkeeper felt that he had done wrong, and promised him his vote
accordingly.
‘That was a clever trick of yours,’ said Sir Watkin, laughing; ‘but it
would not do a second time.’
‘I don’t know, Sir Watkin; it is well to ride the high horse now and
then.’
In another case the Baronet did not get off quite so well. Said an
operative at one of his meetings:
‘Why are the mothers and sisters of peers, who have done nothing for the
public, to be maintained in luxury and at the public expense, while we
are obliged to support our poor relatives from our hard-earned wages or
see them sent to the workhouse?’
Happily the Baronet’s supporters made such a noise that the reply was
unheard.
But there was a stronger influence at work.
‘What is the chief recommendation of Sir Watkin?’ asked one of Mr.
Wentworth’s supporters of a friend of the Baronet’s.
‘Money, to be sure. He’s got it here,’ said the Baronet’s supporter,
significantly slapping his pocket.
But the Conservative candidate had money as well. The question was,
which had the longest purse.
‘And, then, look at the requisition presented to him,’ continued the
Baronet’s friend.
‘Got up by his agent, as a matter of course, who was well paid for his
work.’
‘Then look at his committee.’
‘All men who are his tradespeople, or tenants and dependents, or flunkies
who want to be invited to the Hall. There has been no independent action
in the matter.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account