Crying for the Light; Or, Fifty Years Ago. Vol. 2 [of 3]Ritchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
General
Crying for the Light; Or, Fifty Years Ago. Vol. 2 [of 3]
Ritchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
England -- Social conditions -- 19th century -- Fiction
‘For his desertion of the people.’
‘Really, Mr. Wentworth, you are amusing. You make me laugh,’ said the
reverend father, looking uncommonly angry. ‘Should the priest not take
the part of the people?’
‘Certainly. But he does nothing of the kind. Is he not the partisan of
the popular agitator? Does he not place himself by the side of men whose
language is utterly false? Who stimulates the passions of the people to
fever heat? who teach the poor Irish—ignorant as they are, assassins as I
fear a few of them are, cowards as they are when human life is to be
saved—that they have every virtue under heaven?’
‘Indeed, Mr. Wentworth,’ said the priest indignantly, ‘I know nothing of
the kind. Ireland has been trampled under foot by the murdering English,
and now we are within measurable distance of Home Rule.’
‘And what will be the good of that?’
‘That the Irish will have their rights at last; that we shall be free of
English tyranny and English injustice.’
‘Yes, you will change King Stork for King Log. Irishmen are bound to
quarrel. I was at Queenstown last summer, and taking up the Cork paper,
I read an account of the meeting of the Harbour Commissioners. In the
course of the meeting, one member denounced another as a humbug and
miscreant of the vilest character, and said, old as he was, he was
prepared to fight him with the weapons God had given him, and thereupon
asked him to step into the next room and have it out. When I mentioned
the matter to a priest, he said sarcastically, “Of course there are no
rows in the British House of Commons.” I replied that the questions
discussed there were more likely to lead to heated debate than the
trifling matters a set of Harbour Commissioners would have to deal with.
Furthermore, I added that when we did have a row, it was often begun by
Irishmen, and generally connected with Irish affairs.’
‘Ireland must be governed by Irish ideas; that is all we want.’
‘Let us look at Scotland. England and Scotland were joined together, and
the union was as much hated by the Scotch as the Irish union is hated by
your people now. Look at England and Scotland now. Are they not one
people—equally great, equally flourishing, equally happy under what was,
at one time, a detested union? Why should not England and Ireland get on
just as well? Had we given way to Scotch ideas, we should now be at
loggerheads.’
‘Unfortunately, you see, in Ireland,’ said the priest, ‘public opinion is
the other way.’
‘Public opinion! What public opinion have you, where boycotting and the
bullet of the midnight assassin, who, coward-like, waits for his
unsuspecting victim in a ditch or behind a stone wall, have created a
reign of terror under which all freedom of thought and action is
suppressed? Public opinion does not exist in Ireland. The Irish are
down-trodden indeed. No Russian serfs are worse off.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account