Crying for the Light; Or, Fifty Years Ago. Vol. 3 [of 3]Ritchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
General
Crying for the Light; Or, Fifty Years Ago. Vol. 3 [of 3]
Ritchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
England -- Social conditions -- 19th century -- Fiction
Again, we all of us think too much of money and money-making. Is it not
time that we utter a word of warning in the matter? It is inconvenient
to have no money, most of us know by practical experience; but the
possession of much of it is not after all a guarantee of respectability
of character, or individual capacity. We call ourselves a Christian
people, we profess to be actuated by Christian principles. The Master
was a poor man—a carpenter’s son—His disciples were poor men. If any
class are particularly referred to in the New Testament as far from the
kingdom, they are the rich. All modern society is based on the opposite
idea. We give the rich man the chief place in the synagogue. The
society journals delight to do him honour. He has even made church-going
the fashion. This is no age of poor geniuses. Our artists, our poets or
teachers are all of the well-to-do. A Burns, or a Bloomfield, would be
thought nothing of in our time. The modern woman is impossible in a poor
community. When a lady writer is described in our magazines and
newspapers, the writer dwells at painful length on the costliness of her
surroundings; her dresses, her parties, the expensiveness of her
furniture, and the signs of wealth she everywhere displays. The
millions—how they toil and how miserably they live! The rich—what an
idle life they lead! And then think of the way in which that wealth,
which is often a curse to them, is obtained! Far away indeed is the new
heaven and the new earth in which dwelleth righteousness; infamous as are
the means by which the wealth we envy and admire is obtained, how ready
we are to do homage to its possessor, poor as he may be in spirit, and
unclean and unlovely in his life! Wentworth saw, as we all do, this
unsatisfactory side of all human affairs. The time had come, he thought,
for an effort for something better, for a state in which the wealth
earned by the labourer should be more equitably distributed. There was a
divine order in life, he believed, which had been lost sight of, and
forgotten, and the result was unmitigated poverty and wretchedness. For
this society was responsible, and especially its rulers, who had
increased the sufferings of the poor, who had trampled on the weak, who
had played into the hands of the rich and the strong; he did not believe,
as some of our modern lights do, that the masses were always right and
the classes always wrong. It seemed to him that there were good and bad
amongst them all, that circumstances were such, that there was little
hope of change for the better. Circumstances were too strong for the
individual to conquer. Take intemperance, for instance, the main cause
of England’s wretchedness; how is it possible to grapple with that in
society, where intoxicating drink is deemed, in most circles, a daily
necessity of life?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account