the diamonds even when the Nicols were parallel.
It is obvious, then, that both a transparent non-crystalline substance
such as glass, and a cubic crystal, must be free from strain in order
that it shall exhibit no colour in polarised light and, indeed, no
polarisation effects whatever, and behave as an isotropic substance.
[Illustration:
_PLATE XVI._
FIG. 82.—Ten Diamonds exhibiting Natural Faces, mounted for the
Lantern Polariscope, to show Polarisation Colours due to Internal
Strain.
]
[Illustration:
FIG. 121.—Doubly Refracting Liquid Crystals of Cholesteryl Acetate,
projected on the Screen in the Act of Growth (see p. 281).
TWO FIGURES ILLUSTRATING THE HARDEST (DIAMOND) AND THE SOFTEST (LIQUID
CRYSTALS) OF CRYSTALS.
]
The second special case to which attention may be called, that of a
plate of an ordinary uniaxial crystal such as calcite, cut
perpendicularly to the optic axis, is also obviously subject to the same
proviso, that the crystal must be free from strain in order to exhibit
the normal phenomena. Such a perfectly normal plate remains quite
obscure in the dark field in parallel light, producing neither colour
nor interference figure, even on rotation of the object stage with the
crystal, in its own plane. For the light traverses the crystal along the
optic axis, the axis of single refraction, and the vibrations occur with
equal velocity in all directions perpendicular to it. Hence there is no
division into two rays, one retarded behind the other on account of less
velocity of vibration, and therefore no interference colour.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account