Curiosities of Music: A Collection of Facts not generally known, regarding the Music of Ancient and Savage NationsElson, Louis Charles
History
Curiosities of Music: A Collection of Facts not generally known, regarding the Music of Ancient and Savage Nations
Elson, Louis Charles
Music -- History and criticism
It is singular, however, that the noise of the gong, tamtam, trumpet,
etc., are inseparable from all Chinese dramatic performances: although
the noise is deafening, and the voices of the actors are sometimes
drowned in spite of their shouting themselves hoarse, yet this
pandemonium only gives tranquil delight to the Chinese spectator whether
he be of high or low class. It is so extraordinary a fact that
physiologists and anatomists have endeavored to prove that the cause is
due to a peculiar formation of the Chinese ear.[138]
Certain it is that the Chinese are so passionately fond of the drama,
that they will sometimes pass many hours in succession in this noisy
entertainment.
There is a tremendous number of comedians in China; most of them are
purchased in early infancy by the chiefs of troupes, and by them trained
in music, singing, declamation, pantomime, and dance. It is a species of
slavery, not very unlike that of old Rome, but is not always life-long.
Some comedians, especially the chiefs, acquire large fortunes in the
exercise of their calling, but the caste is so looked down upon, by the
general public, and the facility of confiscating their fortune is so
great, that they seldom attempt to leave the profession, or make any
display of their wealth, lest it should be seized under any pretext by
some mandarin, in which case (in spite of the theoretical justice of
China) it would probably be beyond recovery.[139]
We may mention here, a peculiar mode of paying actors, in Cochin China.
The occasion described is an entertainment, the expenses of which were
borne by the Quong, or provincial governor. An Englishman who was
present, thus speaks of the affair,—“The Quong was there squatted on a
raised platform in front of the actors, with a small drum before him,
supported in a diagonal position, on which he would strike a tap every
time any part of the performance pleased him; which was also a signal
for his purse bearer to show a small string of about twenty _cash_ to
the actors. To my taste this spoiled the effect of the piece; for every
time the _cash_ fell among them, there would be a silence, and the next
moment a scramble for the money; and it fell so frequently as almost to
keep time with the discordant music of the orchestra.
The actors were engaged by the day, and in this manner received their
payment, the amount of which depended upon the approbation of the
_Quong_, and the number of times he encored them by tapping his drum. I
could see that many of them paid far more attention to the drum than
they did to their performance; though I suppose the amount thrown to
them is equally divided. Sometimes the string on which the _cash_ was
tied, unluckily broke, and the money flew in all directions; by which
some of the by-standers profited, not being honorable enough to hand it
up to the poor actors.[140]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account