Curiosities of Puritan NomenclatureBardsley, Charles Wareing Endell
History
Curiosities of Puritan Nomenclature
Bardsley, Charles Wareing Endell
Names, Personal -- English
The character of all these names is sufficient proof of their rarity. All
belong, with one exception, to the higher ranks of society. All were
called after the children in the royal nursery, or Maria or Posthuma was
the second component. Several formed the double name with both. It seems
certain that at first it was expected that, if people in high life were to
give encouragement to the new fashion, they must do so within certain
carefully defined limits. As for any lower class, it was never imagined
that they would dream of aspiring to such a daring innovation. The
earliest instance of this class, I find, still has Mary for its second
component, and commemorates two English queens:
"1667, Jan. 12. Baptized Elizabeth Mary, being of the age of 18 and
upwards, daughter to John Allen, and Emm his wife, both of them being
pro-baptists."--Cant. Cath.
Even to the close of the seventeenth century, if a middle-class man gave
his child a double name, it must be to commemorate royalty:
"1696, June 4. Baptized William Henry, son of Mr. Jacob Janeway, and
Francis his wife."--Cant. Cath.
William III. was christened William Henry.
Speaking of Mary's husband, we may add that two of the most familiar
conjunctions of the present day among the middle and lower classes, that
of Anna Maria or Mary Ann, arose similarly. In Italy and France the two
went together a hundred years earlier, in connection with the Virgin and
her mother. In England they are only found since 1700, being used as
commemorative of the sisters Anne and Mary, both queens. Like William
Henry, the combination has been popular ever since:
"1717, Feb. 15. Christened Anne-Mary, d. of James Hebert, mercer.
"1729, March 30. Christened Anna-Maria, d. of Thomas and Mary Hoare,
pewterer."--St. Dionis Backchurch.
The clerk of Finchley Church could not understand this conjunction--not to
add that his education seems to have been slightly neglected:
"1715, Feb. 26. Baptized Anammeriah, d. of Thomas and Eliz. Biby.
"1716, M{ch}. 17. Baptized Anameriah, d. of Richard and Sarah Bell."
These are the first double names to be found in this register.
The Latin form represents the then prevailing fashion. There was not a
girl's name in use that was not Latinized. Goldsmith took off the custom
in his "Vicar of Wakefield," in the names of Sophia, Olivia, and Carolina
Wilhelmina Amelia Skeggs. The latter hit at the new rage for double and
treble baptismal names also; for the day came when two names were not
enough. In 1738 George III. was christened George William Frederic. Gilly
Williams, writing to George Selwyn, December 12, 1764, says--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account