laboratory, the particles then follow the lines of force toward the
poles. While they are above the equatorial regions they do not become
luminescent, because at the great elevation that they there occupy
there is virtually no atmosphere; but as they pass on toward the north
and the south they begin to descend with the lines of force, curving
down to meet at the poles; and, encountering a part of the atmosphere
comparable in density with what remains in an exhausted Crookes tube,
they produce a glow of cathode rays. This glow is conceived to
represent the Aurora, which may consequently be likened to a gigantic
exhibition of vacuum-tube lights. Anybody who recalls his student days
in the college laboratory and who has witnessed a display of Northern
Lights will at once recognize the resemblance between them in colors,
forms, and behavior. This resemblance had often been noted before
Arrhenius elaborated his hypothesis.
Without intending to treat his interesting theory as more than a
possibly correct explanation of the phenomena of the Aurora, we may
call attention to some apparently confirmatory facts. One of the most
striking of these relates to a seasonal variation in the average number
of auroræ. It has been observed that there are more in March and
September than at any other time of the year, and fewer in June and
December; moreover (and this is a delicate test as applied to the
theory), they are slightly rarer in June than in December. Now all
these facts seem to find a ready explanation in the hypothesis of
Arrhenius, thus: (1) The particles issuing from the sun are supposed to
come principally from the regions whose excitement is indicated by the
presence of sun-spots (which accords with Hale’s observation that
sun-spots are columns of ionized vapors), and these regions have a
definite location on either side of the solar equator, seldom
approaching it nearer than within 5° or 10° north or south, and never
extending much beyond 35° toward either pole; (2) The equator of the
sun is inclined about 7° to the plane of the earth’s orbit, from which
it results that twice in a year—_viz.,_ in June and December—the earth
is directly over the solar equator, and twice a year—_viz.,_ in March
and September—when it is farthest north or south of the solar equator,
it is over the inner edge of the sun-spot belts. Since the corpuscles
must be supposed to be propelled radially from the sun, few will reach
the earth when the latter is over the solar equator in June and
December, but when it is over, or nearly over, the spot belts, in March
and September, it will be in the line of fire of the more active parts
of the solar surface, and relatively rich streams of particles will
reach it. This, as will be seen from what has been said above, is in
strict accord with the observed variations in the frequency of auroræ.
Even the fact that somewhat fewer auroræ are seen in June than in
December also finds its explanation in the known fact that the earth is
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account