belonged to the same stream, although the true relationship of the
phenomena was not immediately apprehended. Olmsted ascribed to the
meteors a revolution about the sun once in every six months, bringing
them to the intersection of their orbit with that of the earth every
November 13th; but later investigators found that the real period was
about thirty-three and one-quarter years, so that the great displays
were due three times in a century, and their return was confidently
predicted for the year 1866. The appearance of the meteors in 1832, a
year before the great display, was ascribed to the great length of the
stream which they formed in space—so great that they required more than
two years to cross the earth’s orbit. In 1832 the earth had encountered
a relatively rare part of the stream, but in 1833, on returning to the
crossing-place, it found there the richest part of the stream pouring
across its orbit. This explanation also proved to be correct, and the
predicted return in 1866 was duly witnessed, although the display was
much less brilliant than in 1833. It was followed by another in 1867.
[Illustration: Curious forms of meteorite trains
Nos. 1 to 6 show the changes undergone by a train left by a meteorite
which passed near the “Great Dipper”; 7 shows the changes and drift of
a train seen in the constellation Virgo; 8 is the singular train of the
meteorite of February 22, 1909, near the Pole Star. (From _La
Nature_.)]
In the mean time Olmsted’s idea of a cometary relationship of the
meteors was demonstrated to be correct by the researches of
Schiaparelli and others, who showed that not only the November meteors,
but those of August, which are seen more or less abundantly every year,
traveled in the tracks of well-known comets, and had undoubtedly an
identical origin with those comets. In other words the comets and the
meteor-swarms were both remnants of original masses which had probably
been split up by the action of the sun, or of some planet to which they
had made close approaches. The annual periodicity of the August meteors
was ascribed to the fact that the separation had taken place so long
ago that the meteors had become distributed all around the orbit, in
consequence of which the earth encountered some of them every year when
it arrived at the crossing-point. Then Leverrier showed that the
original comet associated with the November meteors was probably
brought into the system by the influence of the planet Uranus in the
year 126 of the Christian era. Afterward Alexander Herschel identified
the tracks of no less than seventy-six meteor-swarms (most of them
inconspicuous) with those of comets. The still more recent researches
of Mr W. F. Denning make it probable that there are no meteors which do
not belong to a flock or system probably formed by the disintegration
of a cometary mass; even the apparently sporadic ones which shoot
across the sky, “lost souls in the night,” being members of flocks
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account