Current History, Vol. VIII, No. 3, June 1918: A Monthly Magazine of the New York TimesVarious
History
Current History, Vol. VIII, No. 3, June 1918: A Monthly Magazine of the New York Times
Various
World War, 1914-1918
In this conference MacDonald, Fairchild, and Jowett were elected
delegates to Stockholm. We at once resolved that no delegates should
leave this country. And none did.
That is the history of the seamen's determination to bottle up such
British pacifists as may desire to go abroad spreading their
doctrine. Mingled with it is the grim, sad story of 12,000 members
of the Seamen's Union who have lost their lives on merchant ships
through Germany's criminal conduct on the seas.
And while there is here and there one in England who resembles a
leader of labor who is a pacifist, the determination of the British
seamen to go through with the war to the finish is scarcely more
than a reflection of the rank-and-file spirit that is to be found
throughout the whole of British labor.
NO PARLEYS WITH ENEMY LABOR
The American delegates met the representatives of labor in London and in
Paris. In England they found the sentiment almost unanimous in approval
of their decision to favor no conferences with German labor
representatives until a victory had been achieved. In France, however,
they encountered a group that favored contact with the German and
Austrian Socialists. On May 6 there was a conference in Paris between
the American labor delegates and the members of the Confederation
Générale de Travail, the great French revolutionary labor organization.
M. Jouhaux, General Secretary of the confederation, made the proposed
international conference practically the sole note of his speech.
France, he asserted, had no hatred for the German workers themselves,
and he pointed out that if the conference took place it could have only
one of two results. Either the workers in the enemy countries would
refuse to join in the efforts of the workers of the allied countries for
the liberation of the world's peoples, in which case the war must
continue, or they would accept the allied view of what was right and
would act with the allied peoples for the good of humanity.
The American reply was in these definite words:
"We don't hate the German workers any more than you do, but to give them
our hand now would be looked upon by them only as a sign of weakness."
After reminding the congress of the hypocritical professions of the
German Socialist Party before the war, the delegation declared itself in
entire agreement with Samuel Gompers that American labor men would
refuse to meet the German delegates under any circumstances so long as
Germany was ruled by an Imperialistic Government. This declaration left
Albert Thomas, former Cabinet officer and leader of the group,
practically without a word to say. M. Thomas urged the same arguments
as Jouhaux, but all the satisfaction the French labor men got was a
promise from James Wilson, President of the American delegation, to
report the matter to the American workers when he returned home.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account