Cycling art, energy, and locomotion : $b A series of remarks on the development of bicycles, tricycles, and man-motor carriagesScott, Robert P. (Robert Pittis)
History
Cycling art, energy, and locomotion : $b A series of remarks on the development of bicycles, tricycles, and man-motor carriages
Scott, Robert P. (Robert Pittis)
Bicycles; Cycling; Tricycles
The first prominent patent in the American office, upon balls or
rollers, is dated June 18, 1861, No. 32,604. There are some three
hundred drawings of roller and ball-bearing patents on file at the
United States office; this, however, does not represent the entire
number issued. All of the more recent patents are substantially
modifications of former patterns, such as No. 29,570, 1860; 37,765,
1863; 58,739, 1866; 63,609, 1867; 82,665, 1868; 113,867, 1871; 202,271,
1878, and Peter’s, November 20, 1877, No. 197,289.
One of the most useful variations and the one best adapted to the
cycle art, is the lateral adjusting bearing of this style.
[Illustration: Rear-wheel bearing.]
Below find selected figure and claim from a prominent patent over which
there has been much contention.
+J. H. HUGHES, BEARING FOR WHEELS, NO. 227,632, PATENTED
MAY 18, 1880.+
[Illustration: Hughes’s Patent.]
“What I claim, and wish protected by Letters Patent is,—
“In bearings for bicycles, tricycles, or carriages, the combination
of hardened conical or curved surfaces, hardened spherical balls,
and the means, substantially as shown and described, of adjusting
or setting up the parts, for the purposes set forth.
“+Joseph Henry Hughes.+”
Other forms, such as the disk pattern with an annular groove upon its
face, have their special uses.
As to friction, ball-bearings may be said to reduce this to nothing,
since in mathematical calculations, rolling friction on hard surfaces
is usually neglected, as compared with sliding friction. In actual
practice this would not quite hold good, since oil and dirt will make
a difference. The balls, in the ordinary bearings in the market, roll
upon conical, spherical, or cylindrical surfaces. In either of the last
two cases the radius of curvature of the box is so much greater than
that of the ball that the effect is the same as upon the cone, and in
all cases where a bearing is well constructed the action is the same as
that of a ball rolling upon a flat surface. True, some friction results
from the contact of the balls with each other, but as there is no force
driving them together, it is very slight.
[Illustration: Annular, ball-bearing.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account