Cycling art, energy, and locomotion : $b A series of remarks on the development of bicycles, tricycles, and man-motor carriagesScott, Robert P. (Robert Pittis)
History
Cycling art, energy, and locomotion : $b A series of remarks on the development of bicycles, tricycles, and man-motor carriages
Scott, Robert P. (Robert Pittis)
Bicycles; Cycling; Tricycles
Beware of the “no patent, no pay” fellows. It costs just as much to
find out that the office will not grant the patent as to find out that
it will, unless a careful preliminary settles the case definitely. You
can be assured that if the invention is promising it will ultimately,
in all probability, have to stand the scrutiny of a court before
it will be of any great value. If you do not intend to go into the
manufacture of your invention, a good plan is to offer it to a reliable
man already in the business before you go into any expense at all;
of course, taking the precaution of having your sketch witnessed, as
before advised. Very few manufacturers in the cycle or any other line
are the notorious patent thieves they are commonly supposed to be;
especially are they loath to take advantage of a confiding inventor who
has no patent. Of course, if you have taken out a patent, and pretend
by virtue thereof to assert that you are protected, you make yourself
a legitimate prey if your patent happens to be invalid, which it often
is even when the invention deserves the most rigid protection. There
are, in all, over five thousand patents in the world in connection with
the cycle art, many of which are sound. Think of this before you divert
your mind from your legitimate business. It seems hard to the general
would-be inventor to say it, but I believe that the proper persons to
spend their time and talents in the invention of cycles are the persons
employed by the manufacturers for that purpose. In trusting to the
judgment of the manufacturer in regard to any idea you may have, if you
keep your sketch and a copy of your correspondence, it will be powerful
evidence against him if he plays false with you and goes into a fight
for priority of invention. Almost any manufacturer will answer a letter
about a new idea in his own line, and if he decides against you he
will generally give his reasons, from which you can judge whether it
will pay you to go ahead or not. This advice may seem to encourage a
great risk to the inventor, but I give it from the experience on both
sides of the fence. Inventors will say that they get no attention
from manufacturers; this, when true, is almost invariably because the
alleged invention is absolutely unworthy of any attention at all,
though of course all inquiries should receive courteous answers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account