Cycling art, energy, and locomotion : $b A series of remarks on the development of bicycles, tricycles, and man-motor carriagesScott, Robert P. (Robert Pittis)
History
Cycling art, energy, and locomotion : $b A series of remarks on the development of bicycles, tricycles, and man-motor carriages
Scott, Robert P. (Robert Pittis)
Bicycles; Cycling; Tricycles
In Fig. 1, in the annexed diagram, we show the distance forward and
upward, _a_ to _b_, the rider must be thrown before he gets beyond the
gravity line, _g_, in the Ordinary; Fig. 2 shows the distance when
the wheel will not revolve backward through the fork. In either case,
the header is supposed to be taken on a smooth road and not against
an obstruction; this can easily occur in vaulting into the saddle or
in leaning too far forward. It will be noticed that the distance the
rider is elevated, or, in other words, the amount of work done against
gravity, is in both cases the same, but the distance forward he must
be thrown is considerably greater in Fig. 2. This is for the reason
that while the point of contact, _h_, with the ground remains the same
in Fig. 1, in Fig. 2 the point rolls on to _i_. For more accurate
illustration of the work to be done against gravity, and the distance
forward the rider must be thrown, see the header curves in Figs. 4 and
5, farther on.
We see, then, that the advantage which the anti-header (No. 2) has
over the Ordinary machine (No. 1) is not so very great when in both
cases a smooth road is considered; when, however, we consider the
element of an obstacle in the path, the difference is much more in
favor of No. 2. Let us compare the action of both classes of machines
against a four-inch obstruction. In all cases the action of No. 1
machine will be the same,—that is, the wheel will remain in contact at
_h_, Fig. 1, and the saddle will go on over, just as it does in the
case of no obstruction at all. But in No. 2 the very act of taking
the header must raise the entire weight and roll the system upon the
obstacle, as shown in Fig. 3.
[Illustration: Anti-header wheel action on obstruction.]
The point of contact, _h_, over and beyond which the centre of gravity
must be thrown, will not only move forward, as shown in Fig. 2, but
will move to the top of the obstacle _i_, Fig. 3. Or, if the question
is one of a rut or indentation in the surface of the roadway, No. 2
will be caused to roll partially or altogether out of the rut. Now,
since the rider, by the action of his momentum and that of the machine,
is rolled upon the obstacle or out of the rut, it is easily seen that
if he is attending strictly to his work and is at all a skilful rider,
he can, by a lively thrust upon the pedal at the opportune time, right
himself and keep the drive-wheel rolling on, in which case the rear
part of the machine will, in all ordinary cases, drop back upon the
ground, from which, of course, it will have raised.
[Illustration: Ordinary header curve, any obstruction.]
[Illustration: Anti-header attachment, smooth road.]
[Illustration: Anti-header, four-inch obstruction.]
[Illustration: Anti-header, eight-inch obstruction.]
In the diagrams herewith annexed, Fig. 4 shows the curve of the saddle
of a No. 1 (Ordinary) machine on a level road, and which would be the
same against any obstruction. Scale, one-sixteenth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account