Cycling art, energy, and locomotion : $b A series of remarks on the development of bicycles, tricycles, and man-motor carriagesScott, Robert P. (Robert Pittis)
History
Cycling art, energy, and locomotion : $b A series of remarks on the development of bicycles, tricycles, and man-motor carriages
Scott, Robert P. (Robert Pittis)
Bicycles; Cycling; Tricycles
Appertaining to this matter, I have used a machine with the same
sizes of wheels as those found in the Kangaroo, but in which the power
devices were very close together, and I have found it comparatively
free from slip; and I am also informed by riders of the machine called
the Facile, in which the pedals are closer together, that it is
remarkably free from the same difficulty. But these facts cannot be
taken as a proof of the theory under consideration, for the reason that
_ab_
the application of the formula _R_ = _W_ ———— to the two machines
_ac_
just spoken of, at best, still gives, as a result, a large amount of
side pressure, which in actual practice does not exist. What difference
it may make in the Facile or other treadle machines that the point
of application of power is in the rear of the driving axle, I cannot
say, or what difference a lever motion would show as compared with the
simple crank is also not apparent; in fact, there is very little of
established data from which to draw a conclusion, and a good reason
which would now deter any cautious man from offering much experience
or any theory in the matter will be readily surmised after reading the
following extracts from the _Cyclist_ on the subject.
“SIDE-SLIPPING ON SAFETIES.
“One of the principal causes of the falling out of favor of the
‘Kangaroo’ type of Safety was the great proneness it had to
side-slipping upon greasy roads, and it was confidently and freely
asserted when the rear-driver was introduced that this defect was,
in its construction, overcome. That this is not the case every one
who has had any extensive experience with this class of machine
will admit; indeed, the side-slipping of the Safety is its one
great fault. As our readers know, the forks of a Safety of this
type are considerably sloped,—some more so than others. It matters
not whether the forks are straight or curved, so far as the point
we are dealing with now is concerned. The sloping of the fork
places the wheel, unless travelling in an absolutely straight line,
more or less on its side. The result is manifest. There is a strong
force behind pushing it forward. So long as the ground gives enough
frictional resistance to the wheel, well and good; but so soon as
the surface is lubricated, as it is, by the slippery mud, then the
tendency is at once to push the machine over. This tendency is
increased, as with the side-slipping upon other forms of machines,
by a sloping road surface, the side of a rut, or the cant of the
machine in turning a corner; and, moreover, the harder the rider
pushes the more chance there is of the machine slipping. Having,
then, pointed out the cause of side-slipping, it remains for those
who devote their time and talents to invention to overcome it. So
far as we can see, a vertical steering-fork should do that which is
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account