Cyprus: Historical and DescriptiveLöher, Franz von
History
Cyprus: Historical and Descriptive
Löher, Franz von
Cyprus -- Description and travel; Cyprus -- History
“It is the direct route to India. It is the shortest and the cheapest
both for constructing and working a railway; so free from engineering
difficulties, that it almost appears as though designed by the hand of
nature to be the highway of nations between the east and the west; the
most surely defensible by England—both of its termini being on the open
seas; and the most likely to prove remunerative.
“Both in an engineering and a political point of view, the Euphrates
route undoubtedly possesses great advantages over any of the others
which have been proposed.
“All the routes which have been suggested from places on the Black
Sea are open to the fatal objection that, while they would be of the
greatest service to Russia, they would be altogether beyond the control
of Great Britain, while the engineering difficulties with which they
are surrounded, are of themselves sufficient to exclude them from
practical consideration.
“This has been fully established by the evidence of the witnesses
examined by the Select Committee of the House of Commons, which lately
investigated the merits of the various proposals for connecting the
Mediterranean and the Black Seas with the Persian Gulf.
“In the course of the investigation by the Committee, it was
demonstrated that the proposed Euphrates Valley Railway is an eminently
feasible undertaking in an engineering sense; that the route of the
Euphrates and the Persian Gulf is decidedly preferable in respect of
climate to that by Egypt and the Red Sea; that as regards the safety
and facility of the navigation, the Persian Gulf also has by far the
advantage; that the proposed undertaking would be of great commercial
moment, and if not immediately profitable, at all events that it would
be so at a date not far distant; and, finally, that it would be of the
highest political and strategic importance to this country.
“A railway through Mesopotamia, as a route to India, would not at first
be productive of much income to a company from traffic, but in a few
years—certainly before the railway could be finished—the cultivation
of grain would increase a hundred-fold, and would go on increasing a
thousand fold, and would attain to a magnitude and extension quite
impossible to calculate, because bad harvests are almost unknown in
these parts, for there is always plenty of rain and a hot sun to ripen
the corn. Populous villages would spring up all along the line, as
there is abundance of sweet water everywhere. Cereals can be grown
there so cheaply, that no country the same distance from England—say
for instance Russia—could compete with it at all. And if Great
Britain finds it necessary to rely more on the importation of foreign
corn, where could a better field be found than the fertile plains of
Mesopotamia, which has all the advantages of climate, soil, and sun in
its favour?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account