Biographical fiction; Cyrus, King of Persia, -529 B.C. -- Fiction; Education of princes -- Fiction
shameful, but live in the practice of all that is beautiful and good."
NOTES
C1. Notice the epic tone now adopted, or rather swum into, or rather
which floats the writer up of its own motion.
C1.2 ff. On the whole this description of the battle is, for Xenophon,
obscure.
C1.5-6. Xenophon, Artist. This military criticism and technical
discussion juxtaposed to the epic prelude and the epic sequel is a
clever device enough. We are pleased.
C1.8-9. Final injunctions somewhat obscure, I think.
C1.24 ff. The epic and Homeric vein.
C1.33. The Egyptians have the advantage. This is noticeable in reference
to Cyrus' criticisms of their arms before battle. That is not a slip,
but a dramatic touch on the part of the author, I think. And Cyrus is
speaking of cavalry there, and anticipates the result.
C1.34 fin. A singular feature this in ancient battles. Is it simply
and solely Oriental, or general, and Hellenic also? Has it any analogue
nowadays anywhere? Probably with Egyptian troops in the Soudan it has
(hgd. 1884).
C2.6-7. The archic man through an act of bad discipline makes good
discipline more acceptable.
C2.13. The civilised method of dealing with a conquered city. Instead of
pillage and rapine, an indemnity, which will bring in to the conquerors
wealth, and yet not destroy the arts of the population, which are the
fountain-heads of beauty. || Modern. So the archic man asserts his
superiority once more.
C2.24. Is this also Xenophon's view? If so, it throws light on his
theory of rank and caste.
C3.2. Curious Cyrus should be so little suspicious of Abradatas' death,
is it not? Because the victory was not bloodless. Notice, too,
how little is said of the bloodshed; that is Hellenic as well as
Xenophontine, I fancy.
C3.7. Something epic in all this. Cf. Archilles sacrificing at the tomb
of Patroklos.
C3.8 ff. The pathos of the situation and the _Eironeia_ at its maximum.
"Euripidean" touches throughout.
C3.16. [This is bracketed in most editions, no doubt rightly, as an
interpolation. It was not translated in Mr. Dakyns' manuscript, but his
marginal note is characteristic, and evidently he would have translated
the section in a footnote. It may be rendered thus: "It is said that a
monument was raised above the eunuchs and is in existence to this day.
On the upper slab the names of the husband and the wife are written
in Syrian letters, and below are three other slabs, inscribed 'To the
chamberlains.'"]
C3.16. Interesting, especially if of later insertion, and perhaps given
the historical basis of the story in some monument on the Pactolus,
known to Xenophon. I wish a new Schliemann would find it. hgd.
C4. Semi-historical? The version is to be found, I think, in C4.2, which
is the _pièce justicative_. The episode itself is full of humour, as
good as a play: Xenophon has seen these duplicities often. Brer Fox
outwitted by Brer Rabbit.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account